-
1 Principles for the data access and the testability of digital documents
A German law that requires tax authorities to be capable of digitally checking data from electronic bookkeeping systems.English-Arabic terms dictionary > Principles for the data access and the testability of digital documents
-
2 General Principles for Ship Reporting Systems and Ship Reporting Requirements
1) Сельское хозяйство: Общие принципы систем судовых сообщений и требования к судовым сообщениям (ИМО)Универсальный англо-русский словарь > General Principles for Ship Reporting Systems and Ship Reporting Requirements
-
3 General Principles for Ship Reporting Systems and Ship Reporting Requirements
Общие принципы систем судовых сообщений и требования к судовым сообщениям (ИМО)Англо-русский сельскохозяйственный словарь > General Principles for Ship Reporting Systems and Ship Reporting Requirements
-
4 General Principles for Ship Reporting Systems
* Общие принципы систем судовых сообщений – рез. ИМО A.531(13)English-Russian maritime law dictionary > General Principles for Ship Reporting Systems
-
5 General Principles for Ship Reporting Systems and Ship Reporting Requirements…
* Общие принципы систем судовых сообщений и требований к судовым сообщениям… – их несколько: – 1. – … – рез. ИМО A.598(15) – 2. – …including Guidelines for Reporting Incidents Involving Dangerous Goods, Harmful Substances and/or Marine Pollutants – …, включая руководство по передаче сообщений об инцидентах, связанных со сбросом опасных грузов, вредных веществ и/или загрязнителей моря – рез. ИМО A.851(20) или (с несколько иным переводом названия) A.648(16)English-Russian maritime law dictionary > General Principles for Ship Reporting Systems and Ship Reporting Requirements…
-
6 Forrester, Jay Wright
SUBJECT AREA: Electronics and information technology[br]b. 14 July 1918 Anselmo, Nebraska, USA[br]American electrical engineer and management expert who invented the magnetic-core random access memory used in most early digital computers.[br]Born on a cattle ranch, Forrester obtained a BSc in electrical engineering at the University of Nebraska in 1939 and his MSc at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where he remained to teach and carry out research. Becoming interested in computing, he established the Digital Computer Laboratory at MIT in 1945 and became involved in the construction of Whirlwind I, an early general-purpose computer completed in March 1951 and used for flight-simulation by the US Army Air Force. Finding the linear memories then available for storing data a major limiting factor in the speed at which computers were able to operate, he developed a three-dimensional store based on the binary switching of the state of small magnetic cores that could be addressed and switched by a matrix of wires carrying pulses of current. The machine used parallel synchronous fixed-point computing, with fifteen binary digits and a plus sign, i.e. 16 bits in all, and contained 5,000 vacuum tubes, eleven semiconductors and a 2 MHz clock for the arithmetic logic unit. It occupied a two-storey building and consumed 150kW of electricity. From his experience with the development and use of computers, he came to realize their great potential for the simulation and modelling of real situations and hence for the solution of a variety of management problems, using data communications and the technique now known as interactive graphics. His later career was therefore in this field, first at the MIT Lincoln Laboratory in Lexington, Massachusetts (1951) and subsequently (from 1956) as Professor at the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.[br]Principal Honours and DistinctionsNational Academy of Engineering 1967. George Washington University Inventor of the Year 1968. Danish Academy of Science Valdemar Poulsen Gold Medal 1969. Systems, Man and Cybernetics Society Award for Outstanding Accomplishments 1972. Computer Society Pioneer Award 1972. Institution of Electrical Engineers Medal of Honour 1972. National Inventors Hall of Fame 1979. Magnetics Society Information Storage Award 1988. Honorary DEng Nebraska 1954, Newark College of Engineering 1971, Notre Dame University 1974. Honorary DSc Boston 1969, Union College 1973. Honorary DPolSci Mannheim University, Germany. Honorary DHumLett, State University of New York 1988.Bibliography1951, "Data storage in three dimensions using magnetic cores", Journal of Applied Physics 20: 44 (his first description of the core store).Publications on management include: 1961, Industrial Dynamics, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; 1968, Principles of Systems, 1971, Urban Dynamics, 1980, with A.A.Legasto \& J.M.Lyneis, System Dynamics, North Holland. 1975, Collected Papers, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Further ReadingK.C.Redmond \& T.M.Smith, Project Whirlwind, the History of a Pioneer Computer (provides details of the Whirlwind computer).H.H.Goldstine, 1993, The Computer from Pascal to von Neumann, Princeton University Press (for more general background to the development of computers).Serrell et al., 1962, "Evolution of computing machines", Proceedings of the Institute ofRadio Engineers 1,047.M.R.Williams, 1975, History of Computing Technology, London: Prentice-Hall.See also: Burks, Arthur Walter; Goldstine, Herman H.; Wilkes, Maurice Vincent; Williams, Sir Frederic CallandKF -
7 Bibliography
■ Aitchison, J. (1987). Noam Chomsky: Consensus and controversy. New York: Falmer Press.■ Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.■ Archilochus (1971). In M. L. West (Ed.), Iambi et elegi graeci (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Armstrong, D. M. (1990). The causal theory of the mind. In W. G. Lycan (Ed.), Mind and cognition: A reader (pp. 37-47). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. (Originally published in 1981 in The nature of mind and other essays, Ithaca, NY: University Press).■ Atkins, P. W. (1992). Creation revisited. Oxford: W. H. Freeman & Company.■ Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Bacon, F. (1878). Of the proficience and advancement of learning divine and human. In The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Hurd & Houghton.■ Bacon, R. (1928). Opus majus (Vol. 2). R. B. Burke (Trans.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.■ Bar-Hillel, Y. (1960). The present status of automatic translation of languages. In F. L. Alt (Ed.), Advances in computers (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1981). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1982). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 2). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.■ Barron, F. X. (1963). The needs for order and for disorder as motives in creative activity. In C. W. Taylor & F. X. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its rec ognition and development (pp. 153-160). New York: Wiley.■ Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Bartley, S. H. (1969). Principles of perception. London: Harper & Row.■ Barzun, J. (1959). The house of intellect. New York: Harper & Row.■ Beach, F. A., D. O. Hebb, C. T. Morgan & H. W. Nissen (Eds.) (1960). The neu ropsychology of Lashley. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Berkeley, G. (1996). Principles of human knowledge: Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1710.)■ Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy's view of history. NY: Simon & Schuster.■ Bierwisch, J. (1970). Semantics. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin Books.■ Black, H. C. (1951). Black's law dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.■ Bloom, A. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.■ Bobrow, D. G., & D. A. Norman (1975). Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Stud ies in Cognitive Science (pp. 131-149). New York: Academic Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1977). Artificial intelligence and natural man. New York: Basic Books.■ Boden, M. A. (1981). Minds and mechanisms. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1990a). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Cardinal.■ Boden, M. A. (1990b). The philosophy of artificial intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1994). Precis of The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Behavioral and brain sciences 17, 519-570.■ Boden, M. (1996). Creativity. In M. Boden (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.■ Bolter, J. D. (1984). Turing's man: Western culture in the computer age. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.■ Bolton, N. (1972). The psychology of thinking. London: Methuen.■ Bourne, L. E. (1973). Some forms of cognition: A critical analysis of several papers. In R. Solso (Ed.), Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology (pp. 313324). Loyola Symposium on Cognitive Psychology (Chicago 1972). Washington, DC: Winston.■ Bransford, J. D., N. S. McCarrell, J. J. Franks & K. E. Nitsch (1977). Toward unexplaining memory. In R. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 431-466). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Breger, L. (1981). Freud's unfinished journey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Brehmer, B. (1986). In one word: Not from experience. In H. R. Arkes & K. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 705-719). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 1-59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Brislin, R. W., W. J. Lonner & R. M. Thorndike (Eds.) (1973). Cross- cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.■ Bronowski, J. (1977). A sense of the future: Essays in natural philosophy. P. E. Ariotti with R. Bronowski (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Bronowski, J. (1978). The origins of knowledge and imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Brown, R. O. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Brown, T. (1970). Lectures on the philosophy of the human mind. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 330-387). New York: Random House/Modern Library.■ Bruner, J. S., J. Goodnow & G. Austin (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.■ Calvin, W. H. (1990). The cerebral symphony: Seashore reflections on the structure of consciousness. New York: Bantam.■ Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical man: Information, entropy, language, and life. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Campbell, J. (1989). The improbable machine. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Carlyle, T. (1966). On heroes, hero- worship and the heroic in history. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Originally published in 1841.)■ Carnap, R. (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language [Ueberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache]. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 60-81) A. Pap (Trans). New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1932.)■ Cassirer, E. (1946). Language and myth. New York: Harper and Brothers. Reprinted. New York: Dover Publications, 1953.■ Cattell, R. B., & H. J. Butcher (1970). Creativity and personality. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.■ Caudill, M., & C. Butler (1990). Naturally intelligent systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Chandrasekaran, B. (1990). What kind of information processing is intelligence? A perspective on AI paradigms and a proposal. In D. Partridge & R. Wilks (Eds.), The foundations of artificial intelligence: A sourcebook (pp. 14-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Charniak, E., & McDermott, D. (1985). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Chase, W. G., & H. A. Simon (1988). The mind's eye in chess. In A. Collins & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 461-493). San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.■ Cheney, D. L., & R. M. Seyfarth (1990). How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Chi, M.T.H., R. Glaser & E. Rees (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Janua Linguarum.■ Chomsky, N. (1964). A transformational approach to syntax. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of lan guage (pp. 211-245). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind (enlarged ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.■ Chomsky, N. (1979). Language and responsibility. New York: Pantheon.■ Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger Special Studies.■ Churchland, P. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Clark, A. (1996). Philosophical Foundations. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Artificial in telligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.■ Clark, H. H., & T. B. Carlson (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 313-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Clarke, A. C. (1984). Profiles of the future: An inquiry into the limits of the possible. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.■ Claxton, G. (1980). Cognitive psychology: A suitable case for what sort of treatment? In G. Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 1-25). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Code, M. (1985). Order and organism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.■ Collingwood, R. G. (1972). The idea of history. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self- esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Copland, A. (1952). Music and imagination. London: Oxford University Press.■ Coren, S. (1994). The intelligence of dogs. New York: Bantam Books.■ Cottingham, J. (Ed.) (1996). Western philosophy: An anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.■ Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.■ Craik, K.J.W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.■ Cronbach, L. J., & R. E. Snow (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington. Paperback edition, 1981.■ Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self. New York: Harper Perennial.■ Culler, J. (1976). Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: Penguin Books.■ Curtius, E. R. (1973). European literature and the Latin Middle Ages. W. R. Trask (Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ D'Alembert, J.L.R. (1963). Preliminary discourse to the encyclopedia of Diderot. R. N. Schwab (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.■ Dampier, W. C. (1966). A history of modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Darwin, C. (1911). The life and letters of Charles Darwin (Vol. 1). Francis Darwin (Ed.). New York: Appleton.■ Davidson, D. (1970) Mental events. In L. Foster & J. W. Swanson (Eds.), Experience and theory (pp. 79-101). Amherst: University of Massachussetts Press.■ Davies, P. (1995). About time: Einstein's unfinished revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.■ Davis, R., & J. J. King (1977). An overview of production systems. In E. Elcock & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 8. Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood.■ Davis, R., & D. B. Lenat (1982). Knowledge- based systems in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford: W. H. Freeman.■ deKleer, J., & J. S. Brown (1983). Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistic mental models (1983). In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental modes (pp. 155-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Dennett, D. C. (1978a). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.■ Dennett, D. C. (1978b). Toward a cognitive theory of consciousness. In D. C. Dennett, Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.■ Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.■ Descartes, R. (1897-1910). Traite de l'homme. In Oeuvres de Descartes (Vol. 11, pp. 119-215). Paris: Charles Adam & Paul Tannery. (Originally published in 1634.)■ Descartes, R. (1950). Discourse on method. L. J. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1951). Meditation on first philosophy. L. J. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Descartes, R. (1955). The philosophical works of Descartes. E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Trans.). New York: Dover. (Originally published in 1911 by Cambridge University Press.)■ Descartes, R. (1967). Discourse on method (Pt. V). In E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 106-118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1970a). Discourse on method. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 181-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1970b). Principles of philosophy. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 178-291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1644.)■ Descartes, R. (1984). Meditations on first philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murduch (Trans.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Descartes, R. (1986). Meditations on first philosophy. J. Cottingham (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641 as Med itationes de prima philosophia.)■ deWulf, M. (1956). An introduction to scholastic philosophy. Mineola, NY: Dover Books.■ Dixon, N. F. (1981). Preconscious processing. London: Wiley.■ Doyle, A. C. (1986). The Boscombe Valley mystery. In Sherlock Holmes: The com plete novels and stories (Vol. 1). New York: Bantam.■ Dreyfus, H., & S. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.■ Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can't do: The limits of artificial intelligence (revised ed.). New York: Harper & Row.■ Dreyfus, H. L., & S. E. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.■ Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.■ Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The hidden order of art. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.■ Einstein, A., & L. Infeld (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Eisenstein, S. (1947). Film sense. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.■ Everdell, W. R. (1997). The first moderns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1977). Human memory: Theory, research and individual difference. Oxford: Pergamon.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1984). A handbook of cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Fancher, R. E. (1979). Pioneers of psychology. New York: W. W. Norton.■ Farrell, B. A. (1981). The standing of psychoanalysis. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.■ Fetzer, J. H. (1996). Philosophy and cognitive science (2nd ed.). New York: Paragon House.■ Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Flanagan, O. (1991). The science of the mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Frege, G. (1972). Conceptual notation. T. W. Bynum (Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Originally published in 1879.)■ Frege, G. (1979). Logic. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Gottlob Frege: Posthumous writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1879-1891.)■ Freud, S. (1959). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 143-153). London: Hogarth Press.■ Freud, S. (1966). Project for a scientific psychology. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The stan dard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 1, pp. 295-398). London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published in 1950 as Aus den AnfaЁngen der Psychoanalyse, in London by Imago Publishing.)■ Freud, S. (1976). Lecture 18-Fixation to traumas-the unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 16, p. 285). London: Hogarth Press.■ Galileo, G. (1990). Il saggiatore [The assayer]. In S. Drake (Ed.), Discoveries and opinions of Galileo. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1623.)■ Gassendi, P. (1970). Letter to Descartes. In "Objections and replies." In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2, pp. 179-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Gazzaniga, M. S. (1988). Mind matters: How mind and brain interact to create our conscious lives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin in association with MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Genesereth, M. R., & N. J. Nilsson (1987). Logical foundations of artificial intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.■ Ghiselin, B. (1952). The creative process. New York: Mentor.■ Ghiselin, B. (1985). The creative process. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1952.)■ Gilhooly, K. J. (1996). Thinking: Directed, undirected and creative (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press.■ Glass, A. L., K. J. Holyoak & J. L. Santa (1979). Cognition. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.■ Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Gruber, H. E. (1980). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Gruber, H. E., & S. Davis (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Guthrie, E. R. (1972). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper. (Originally published in 1935.)■ Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.■ Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Hand, D. J. (1985). Artificial intelligence and psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Harris, M. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.■ Haugeland, J. (Ed.) (1981). Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Haugeland, J. (1981a). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 243-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Haugeland, J. (1981b). Semantic engines: An introduction to mind design. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press.■ Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organisation of behaviour. New York: Wiley.■ Hebb, D. O. (1958). A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia: Saunders.■ Hegel, G.W.F. (1910). The phenomenology of mind. J. B. Baille (Trans.). London: Sonnenschein. (Originally published as Phaenomenologie des Geistes, 1807.)■ Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.■ Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.■ Herman, A. (1997). The idea of decline in Western history. New York: Free Press.■ Herrnstein, R. J., & E. G. Boring (Eds.) (1965). A source book in the history of psy chology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Herzmann, E. (1964). Mozart's creative process. In P. H. Lang (Ed.), The creative world of Mozart (pp. 17-30). London: Oldbourne Press.■ Hilgard, E. R. (1957). Introduction to psychology. London: Methuen.■ Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Crooke.■ Holliday, S. G., & M. J. Chandler (1986). Wisdom: Explorations in adult competence. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.■ Horn, J. L. (1986). In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.■ Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.■ Hume, D. (1955). An inquiry concerning human understanding. New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1748.)■ Hume, D. (1975). An enquiry concerning human understanding. In L. A. SelbyBigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (Spelling and punctuation revised.) (Originally published in 1748.)■ Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (With some modifications of spelling and punctuation.) (Originally published in 1690.)■ Hunt, E. (1973). The memory we must have. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language. (pp. 343-371) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian meditations. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.■ Inhelder, B., & J. Piaget (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1955 as De la logique de l'enfant a` la logique de l'adolescent. [Paris: Presses Universitaire de France])■ James, W. (1890a). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover Books.■ James, W. (1890b). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.■ Jevons, W. S. (1900). The principles of science (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.■ Johnson, G. (1986). Machinery of the mind: Inside the new science of artificial intelli gence. New York: Random House.■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind: An introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Jones, E. (1961). The life and work of Sigmund Freud. L. Trilling & S. Marcus (Eds.). London: Hogarth.■ Jones, R. V. (1985). Complementarity as a way of life. In A. P. French & P. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Niels Bohr: A centenary volume. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Kant, I. (1933). Critique of Pure Reason (2nd ed.). N. K. Smith (Trans.). London: Macmillan. (Originally published in 1781 as Kritik der reinen Vernunft.)■ Kant, I. (1891). Solution of the general problems of the Prolegomena. In E. Belfort (Trans.), Kant's Prolegomena. London: Bell. (With minor modifications.) (Originally published in 1783.)■ Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing: Studies in the psychology of learning and teaching. New York: Columbia University Press.■ Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley.■ Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Arkana (Penguin).■ Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology. (pp. 151-235) New York: Academic Press.■ KoЁhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. New York: Liveright.■ KoЁhler, W. (1927). The mentality of apes (2nd ed.). Ella Winter (Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ KoЁhler, W. (1930). Gestalt psychology. London: G. Bell.■ KoЁhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.■ KoЁhler, W. (1969). The task of Gestalt psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Langer, S. (1962). Philosophical sketches. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.■ Langley, P., H. A. Simon, G. L. Bradshaw & J. M. Zytkow (1987). Scientific dis covery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, the Hixon Symposium (pp. 112-146) New York: Wiley.■ LeDoux, J. E., & W. Hirst (1986). Mind and brain: Dialogues in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Lehnert, W. (1978). The process of question answering. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Leiber, J. (1991). Invitation to cognitive science. Oxford: Blackwell.■ Lenat, D. B., & G. Harris (1978). Designing a rule system that searches for scientific discoveries. In D. A. Waterman & F. Hayes-Roth (Eds.), Pattern directed inference systems (pp. 25-52) New York: Academic Press.■ Levenson, T. (1995). Measure for measure: A musical history of science. New York: Touchstone. (Originally published in 1994.)■ Leґvi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. C. Jacobson & B. Grundfest Schoepf (Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1958.)■ Levine, M. W., & J. M. Schefner (1981). Fundamentals of sensation and perception. London: Addison-Wesley.■ Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.■ Lighthill, J. (1972). A report on artificial intelligence. Unpublished manuscript, Science Research Council.■ Lipman, M., A. M. Sharp & F. S. Oscanyan (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.■ Lippmann, W. (1965). Public opinion. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1922.)■ Locke, J. (1956). An essay concerning human understanding. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co. (Originally published in 1690.)■ Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. P. H. Nidditch (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon. (Originally published in 1690.) (With spelling and punctuation modernized and some minor modifications of phrasing.)■ Lopate, P. (1994). The art of the personal essay. New York: Doubleday/Anchor Books.■ Lorimer, F. (1929). The growth of reason. London: Kegan Paul. Machlup, F., & U. Mansfield (Eds.) (1983). The study of information. New York: Wiley.■ Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. New York: Viking.■ Markey, J. F. (1928). The symbolic process. London: Kegan Paul.■ Martin, R. M. (1969). On Ziff's "Natural and formal languages." In S. Hook (Ed.), Language and philosophy: A symposium (pp. 249-263). New York: New York University Press.■ Mazlish, B. (1993). The fourth discontinuity: the co- evolution of humans and machines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ McCarthy, J., & P. J. Hayes (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.■ McClelland, J. L., D. E. Rumelhart & G. E. Hinton (1986). The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the mi crostructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 3-40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/ Bradford Books.■ McCorduck, P. (1979). Machines who think. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ McLaughlin, T. (1970). Music and communication. London: Faber & Faber.■ Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69, 431-436.■ Meehl, P. E., & C. J. Golden (1982). Taxometric methods. In Kendall, P. C., & Butcher, J. N. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 127-182). New York: Wiley.■ Mehler, J., E.C.T. Walker & M. Garrett (Eds.) (1982). Perspectives on mental rep resentation: Experimental and theoretical studies of cognitive processes and ca pacities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Mill, J. S. (1900). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. London: Longmans, Green.■ Miller, G. A. (1979, June). A very personal history. Talk to the Cognitive Science Workshop, Cambridge, MA.■ Miller, J. (1983). States of mind. New York: Pantheon Books.■ Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGrawHill.■ Minsky, M., & S. Papert (1973). Artificial intelligence. Condon Lectures, Oregon State System of Higher Education, Eugene, Oregon.■ Minsky, M. L. (1986). The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Mischel, T. (1976). Psychological explanations and their vicissitudes. In J. K. Cole & W. J. Arnold (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation (Vol. 23). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.■ Morford, M.P.O., & R. J. Lenardon (1995). Classical mythology (5th ed.). New York: Longman.■ Murdoch, I. (1954). Under the net. New York: Penguin.■ Nagel, E. (1959). Methodological issues in psychoanalytic theory. In S. Hook (Ed.), Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy: A symposium. New York: New York University Press.■ Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal questions. London: Cambridge University Press.■ Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.■ Neisser, U. (1972). Changing conceptions of imagery. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 233-251). London: Academic Press.■ Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3-24). London: Academic Press.■ Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement (pp. 179-190). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.■ Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.■ Newell, A. (1973a). Artificial intelligence and the concept of mind. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 1-60). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Newell, A. (1973b). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-310). New York: Academic Press.■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 279-293). New York & McGraw-Hill.■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Nietzsche, F. (1966). Beyond good and evil. W. Kaufmann (Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Originally published in 1885.)■ Nilsson, N. J. (1971). Problem- solving methods in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Nussbaum, M. C. (1978). Aristotle's Princeton University Press. De Motu Anamalium. Princeton, NJ:■ Oersted, H. C. (1920). Thermo-electricity. In Kirstine Meyer (Ed.), H. C. Oersted, Natuurvidenskabelige Skrifter (Vol. 2). Copenhagen: n.p. (Originally published in 1830 in The Edinburgh encyclopaedia.)■ Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.■ Onians, R. B. (1954). The origins of European thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.■ Osgood, C. E. (1960). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1953.)■ Osgood, C. E. (1966). Language universals and psycholinguistics. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (2nd ed., pp. 299-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.■ Peirce, C. S. (1934). Some consequences of four incapacities-Man, a sign. In C. Hartsborne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Saunders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 185-189). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Penfield, W. (1959). In W. Penfield & L. Roberts, Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of conscious ness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Peterfreund, E. (1986). The heuristic approach to psychoanalytic therapy. In■ J. Reppen (Ed.), Analysts at work, (pp. 127-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.■ Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press. (Originally published in 1936.)■ Piaget, J. (1954). Le langage et les opeґrations intellectuelles. Proble` mes de psycho linguistique. Symposium de l'Association de Psychologie Scientifique de Langue Francёaise. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.■ Piaget, J. (1977). Problems of equilibration. In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. 838-841). London: Routlege & Kegan Paul. (Originally published in 1975 as L'eґquilibration des structures cognitives [Paris: Presses Universitaires de France].)■ Piaget, J., & B. Inhelder. (1973). Memory and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.■ Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Morrow.■ Pinker, S. (1996). Facts about human language relevant to its evolution. In J.-P. Changeux & J. Chavaillon (Eds.), Origins of the human brain. A symposium of the Fyssen foundation (pp. 262-283). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Planck, M. (1949). Scientific autobiography and other papers. F. Gaynor (Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.■ Planck, M. (1990). Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie. W. Berg (Ed.). Halle, Germany: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.■ Plato (1892). Meno. In The Dialogues of Plato (B. Jowett, Trans.; Vol. 2). New York: Clarendon. (Originally published circa 380 B.C.)■ Poincareґ, H. (1913). Mathematical creation. In The foundations of science. G. B. Halsted (Trans.). New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. G. B. Halstead (Trans.). New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1929). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1952). Science and method. F. Maitland (Trans.) New York: Dover.■ Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Popper, K. (1968). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row/Basic Books.■ Popper, K., & J. Eccles (1977). The self and its brain. New York: Springer-Verlag.■ Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.■ Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Putnam, H. (1987). The faces of realism. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analog media versus tacit knowledge. In N. Block (Ed.), Imagery (pp. 151-206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Towards a foundation for cog nitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 216-260). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Rabbitt, P.M.A., & S. Dornic (Eds.). Attention and performance (Vol. 5). London: Academic Press.■ Rawlins, G.J.E. (1997). Slaves of the Machine: The quickening of computer technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Reid, T. (1970). An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 151-178). New York: Random House/Modern Library.■ Reitman, W. (1970). What does it take to remember? In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 470-510). London: Academic Press.■ Ricoeur, P. (1974). Structure and hermeneutics. In D. I. Ihde (Ed.), The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics (pp. 27-61). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.■ Robinson, D. N. (1986). An intellectual history of psychology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.■ Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-49) London: Academic Press.■ Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rosch, E., & B. B. Lloyd (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rose, S. (1970). The chemistry of life. Baltimore: Penguin Books.■ Rose, S. (1976). The conscious brain (updated ed.). New York: Random House.■ Rose, S. (1993). The making of memory: From molecules to mind. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1992)■ Roszak, T. (1994). The cult of information: A neo- Luddite treatise on high- tech, artificial intelligence, and the true art of thinking (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.■ Royce, J. R., & W. W. Rozeboom (Eds.) (1972). The psychology of knowing. New York: Gordon & Breach.■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley.■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rumelhart, D. E., & J. L. McClelland (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Rumelhart, D. E., P. Smolensky, J. L. McClelland & G. E. Hinton (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing (Vol. 2, pp. 7-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Russell, B. (1927). An outline of philosophy. London: G. Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1961). History of Western philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1965). How I write. In Portraits from memory and other essays. London: Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1992). In N. Griffin (Ed.), The selected letters of Bertrand Russell (Vol. 1), The private years, 1884- 1914. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Ryecroft, C. (1966). Psychoanalysis observed. London: Constable.■ Sagan, C. (1978). The dragons of Eden: Speculations on the evolution of human intel ligence. New York: Ballantine Books.■ Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Sanford, A. J. (1987). The mind of man: Models of human understanding. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.■ Sapir, E. (1964). Culture, language, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1941.)■ Sapir, E. (1985). The status of linguistics as a science. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality (pp. 160166). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1929).■ Scardmalia, M., & C. Bereiter (1992). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Schafer, R. (1954). Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing. New York: Grune & Stratten.■ Schank, R. C. (1973). Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 187-248). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Schank, R. C. (1976). The role of memory in language processing. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory. (pp. 162-189) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Schank, R. C., & R. P. Abelson (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ SchroЁdinger, E. (1951). Science and humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Searle, J. R. (1981a). Minds, brains, and programs. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 282-306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Searle, J. R. (1981b). Minds, brains and programs. In D. Hofstadter & D. Dennett (Eds.), The mind's I (pp. 353-373). New York: Basic Books.■ Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Serres, M. (1982). The origin of language: Biology, information theory, and thermodynamics. M. Anderson (Trans.). In J. V. Harari & D. F. Bell (Eds.), Hermes: Literature, science, philosophy (pp. 71-83). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1966). Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), Mind and cosmos: Essays in contemporary science and philosophy (pp. 22-40). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1989). The scientist as a problem solver. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert Simon. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Simon, H. A., & C. Kaplan (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 1-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership and chance. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.■ Smith, E. E. (1988). Concepts and thought. In J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 19-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Smith, E. E. (1990). Thinking: Introduction. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking. An invitation to cognitive science. (Vol. 3, pp. 1-2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Socrates. (1958). Meno. In E. H. Warmington & P. O. Rouse (Eds.), Great dialogues of Plato W.H.D. Rouse (Trans.). New York: New American Library. (Original publication date unknown.)■ Solso, R. L. (1974). Theories of retrieval. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Spencer, H. (1896). The principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.■ Steiner, G. (1975). After Babel: Aspects of language and translation. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg, Thinking and problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press.■ Sternberg, R. J., & J. E. Davidson (1985). Cognitive development in gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented (pp. 103-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.■ Storr, A. (1993). The dynamics of creation. New York: Ballantine Books. (Originally published in 1972.)■ Stumpf, S. E. (1994). Philosophy: History and problems (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Random House/Vintage Books.■ Thorndike, E. L. (1906). Principles of teaching. New York: A. G. Seiler.■ Thorndike, E. L. (1970). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. Darien, CT: Hafner Publishing Co. (Originally published in 1911.)■ Titchener, E. B. (1910). A textbook of psychology. New York: Macmillan.■ Titchener, E. B. (1914). A primer of psychology. New York: Macmillan.■ Toulmin, S. (1957). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson.■ Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organisation of memory. London: Academic Press.■ Turing, A. (1946). In B. E. Carpenter & R. W. Doran (Eds.), ACE reports of 1946 and other papers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Turkle, S. (1984). Computers and the second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Tyler, S. A. (1978). The said and the unsaid: Mind, meaning, and culture. New York: Academic Press.■ van Heijenoort (Ed.) (1967). From Frege to Goedel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.■ Varela, F. J. (1984). The creative circle: Sketches on the natural history of circularity. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 309-324). New York: W. W. Norton.■ Voltaire (1961). On the Penseґs of M. Pascal. In Philosophical letters (pp. 119-146). E. Dilworth (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.■ Wagman, M. (1991a). Artificial intelligence and human cognition: A theoretical inter comparison of two realms of intellect. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1991b). Cognitive science and concepts of mind: Toward a general theory of human and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1993). Cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence: Theory and re search in cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1995). The sciences of cognition: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1996). Human intellect and cognitive science: Toward a general unified theory of intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1997a). Cognitive science and the symbolic operations of human and artificial intelligence: Theory and research into the intellective processes. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1997b). The general unified theory of intelligence: Central conceptions and specific application to domains of cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998a). Cognitive science and the mind- body problem: From philosophy to psychology to artificial intelligence to imaging of the brain. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998b). Language and thought in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology, artificial intelligence, and neural science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998c). The ultimate objectives of artificial intelligence: Theoretical and research foundations, philosophical and psychological implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1999). The human mind according to artificial intelligence: Theory, re search, and implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (2000). Scientific discovery processes in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wall, R. (1972). Introduction to mathematical linguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.■ Wason, P. (1977). Self contradictions. In P. Johnson-Laird & P. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Wason, P. C., & P. N. Johnson-Laird. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Watson, J. (1930). Behaviorism. New York: W. W. Norton.■ Watzlawick, P. (1984). Epilogue. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality. New York: W. W. Norton, 1984.■ Weinberg, S. (1977). The first three minutes: A modern view of the origin of the uni verse. New York: Basic Books.■ Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: W. H. Freeman.■ Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to cal culation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Bros.■ Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the modern world. New York: Macmillan.■ Whorf, B. L. (1956). In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Whyte, L. L. (1962). The unconscious before Freud. New York: Anchor Books.■ Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.■ Wiener, N. (1964). God & Golem, Inc.: A comment on certain points where cybernetics impinges on religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. New York: Academic Press.■ Winston, P. H. (1987). Artificial intelligence: A perspective. In E. L. Grimson & R. S. Patil (Eds.), AI in the 1980s and beyond (pp. 1-12). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Winston, P. H. (Ed.) (1975). The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGrawHill.■ Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.■ Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. New York: Harper Colophon.■ Woods, W. A. (1975). What's in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representations and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 35-84). New York: Academic Press.■ Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt; London: Methuen (1939).■ Wundt, W. (1904). Principles of physiological psychology (Vol. 1). E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.■ Wundt, W. (1907). Lectures on human and animal psychology. J. E. Creighton & E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.■ Young, J. Z. (1978). Programs of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Ziman, J. (1978). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Bibliography
-
8 system
'sistəm1) (an arrangement of many parts that work together: a railway system; the solar system; the digestive system.) sistema2) (a person's body: Take a walk every day - it's good for the system!) organismo3) (a way of organizing something according to certain ideas, principles etc: a system of government/education.) sistema4) (a plan or method: What is your system for washing the dishes?) método5) (the quality of being efficient and methodical: Your work lacks system.) organización, sistema, método•- systematically
system n sistematr['sɪstəm]1 (gen) sistema nombre masculino2 (body) cuerpo, organismo\SMALLIDIOMATIC EXPRESSION/SMALLall systems go! ¡todo bien!to get something out of one's system desahogarsesystems analysis análisis nombre masculino de sistemassystems analyst analista nombre masulino o femenino de sistemassystem ['sɪstəm] n1) method: sistema m, método m2) apparatus: sistema m, instalación f, aparato melectrical system: instalación eléctricadigestive system: aparato digestivo3) body: organismo m, cuerpo mdiseases that affect the whole system: enfermedades que afectan el organismo entero4) network: red fn.• constitución s.f.• mecanismo s.m.• método s.m.• red s.f.• régimen s.m.• sistema s.m.'sɪstəm1)a) u c ( ordered structure) sistema m, método mb) c ( procedure) sistema mfiling/classification system — sistema de archivo/clasificación
c) c ( organizational whole) sistema m2) ca) (technical, mechanical) sistema mb) ( Comput) sistema mc) ( Audio) equipo m (de sonido or audio)3) ca) (Anat, Physiol)b) ( body) cuerpo m, organismo mmy system can't cope with so much food — mi cuerpo or mi organismo no puede con tanta comida
to get somebody/something out of one's system: it took me years to get her out of my system me llevó años olvidarla or sacármela de la cabeza; I had to say it; I needed to get it out of my system — se lo tuve que decir; me tenía que desahogar
4) ca) ( form of government) sistema mb) (establishment, status quo)5) c ( for gambling) fórmula f, martingala f (CS)['sɪstǝm]1. N1) (=method) sistema mnew teaching systems — nuevos sistemas or métodos de enseñanza
2) (Pol, Sociol) (=organization) sistema ma political/economic/social system — un sistema político/económico/social
3) (Math, Sci) (=principles) sistema mbinary/decimal/metric system — sistema m binario/decimal/métrico
4) (Elec, Comput, Mech) sistema m5) (=network) sistema m, red ftransport system — sistema m or red f de transportes
6) (=order) método m7) (Med) (=organism) organismo m, cuerpo mthe nervous/immune system — el sistema nervioso/inmunitario
it was quite a shock to the system — (fig) fue un buen golpe para el organismo
- get sth out of one's system8)the system — (=the establishment) el sistema
9) (=classification) sistema m10) (Astron) sistema msolar system — sistema m solar
2.CPDsystem disk N — disco m del sistema
system operator N — (Comput) operador(a) m / f de sistemas
system requirements NPL — requisitos mpl de configuración
systems analysis N — análisis m inv de sistemas
systems analyst N — (Comput) analista mf de sistemas
systems engineer N — (Comput) ingeniero(-a) m / f de sistemas
systems engineering N — ingeniería f de sistemas
systems integrator N — (=business) integrador m de sistemas; (=person) integrador(a) m / f de sistemas
systems programmer N — programador(a) m / f de sistemas
systems software N — software m del sistema
* * *['sɪstəm]1)a) u c ( ordered structure) sistema m, método mb) c ( procedure) sistema mfiling/classification system — sistema de archivo/clasificación
c) c ( organizational whole) sistema m2) ca) (technical, mechanical) sistema mb) ( Comput) sistema mc) ( Audio) equipo m (de sonido or audio)3) ca) (Anat, Physiol)b) ( body) cuerpo m, organismo mmy system can't cope with so much food — mi cuerpo or mi organismo no puede con tanta comida
to get somebody/something out of one's system: it took me years to get her out of my system me llevó años olvidarla or sacármela de la cabeza; I had to say it; I needed to get it out of my system — se lo tuve que decir; me tenía que desahogar
4) ca) ( form of government) sistema mb) (establishment, status quo)5) c ( for gambling) fórmula f, martingala f (CS) -
9 SAP
1) Общая лексика: hum. сокр. Sensitive To Antimicrobial Peptides, hum. сокр. Slam Associated Protein, social action program, Site Access Permit (SEIC), старшее ответственное лицо (Senior Authorised Person, напр. http://www.indeed.co.uk/jobs?q=Senior+Authorised+Person&l=London)2) Компьютерная техника: System Application Program, Systems Application Products, Systems, Applications, and Products3) Медицина: statistical analysis plan, план статистического анализа, нарколог (substance abuse professional), substance abuse professional - нарколог (сокр.)4) Американизм: Scientific Advisory Panel, State Assessment Panel, Statements of Administration Policy, Statutory Adoption Pay, Stop All Progress, Substance Abuse Prevention5) Спорт: Slight Atari Player6) Военный термин: System Acquisition Plan, search and attack pattern, security assistance plan, security assistance program, semiarmor-piercing, shipboard antenna pedestal, standing air patrol, strategic advantages profile, structural analysis program, supervisory airplane pilot, system alignment procedure7) Техника: safety assessment principles, severe accident program, sintered aluminum powder, solar array program, startup administrative procedure, statements on auditing procedures, system acquisition process8) Шутливое выражение: Satan's Accounting Program, Slow And Painful, Somewhat Academic Privacy, Son Af a Pitch9) Религия: Share And Prayer10) Юридический термин: Special Assistance Pass, Substance Abuse Panel, Substance Abuse Program11) Бухгалтерия: Service Advertisement Protocol, Standard Accounting Procedures, Statements on Auditing Procedure, Systems Applications Products, Положения по процедурам аудита (Statements on Auditing Procedures), Принципы ведения бухгалтерскогоучёта, предписанные законом (Statutory Accounting Principles)
12) Страхование: Statutory Accounting Principals13) Автомобильный термин: Standard Corporate Protocol14) Грубое выражение: Stupid American Public, Surely A Pedophile15) Оптика: stress-applying part16) Телекоммуникации: протокол предлагаемых услуг, Service Advertising Protocol (NetWare), Service Access Point (generic)17) Сокращение: Seaborne Air Platform, Second Audio Program, Semi-Armour Piercing, Sensing And Processing unit, Shijiazhuang Aircraft Plant (China), Simulated Attack Profile, Soon As Possible, South African Police (South Africa), Special Access Program (USA), Special Access Program18) Университет: Satisfactory Academic Progress, Scientific Agricultural Partnership, Standard Assessment Performance, Student Assistance Program, Students Aid Project, Students Alumni And Professional, Supply Of Academic Publications19) Электроника: Secondary Audio Program20) Вычислительная техника: Service Access Point, Service Advertising Protocol, symbolic address program, symbolic assembly program, system assist processor, Symbolic Assembler Program (IBM, IBM 704), Session Announcement Protocol (Internet, RFC 2974), Service Advertising Protocol (Novell, Netware, IPX), Service Access Point (OSI), Service Access Point (OSI, Networking), Systems, Applications and Products (in data processing, ag, Hersteller), компания SAP, система компании SAP21) Нефть: An enterprise resource system, программы структурной перестройки, бухгалтерская программа SAP22) Иммунология: Serum Amyloid P23) Транспорт: Suitcase And Passport24) Фирменный знак: System Application And Products, System Application Products, Systems Applications And Programming, Systems, Applications and Products in Data Processing26) Деловая лексика: Safety Awareness Program, Systems Applications Production, описание процедуры отчётности, описание процедуры ревизии (Statement on Auditing Procedure)27) Глоссарий компании Сахалин Энерджи: System, Application and Products for Data Processing28) Образование: Science Activity Planner, Solves All Problems, Standard Assessment Procedure, Standard Assessment Program, State Advisory Panel for Special Education, Student Assistance Plan, Substance Abuse Professional29) Сетевые технологии: Service Announcement Protocol, Start Of Active Profile, System Area Pointer, протокол извещения об услугах, протокол объявления об услугах, протокол представления услуг, протокол рекламного сетевого сервиса, протокол с объявлением о служебных средствах31) Медицинская техника: Super Absorbent Polymer - впитывающий полимер (применяется во впитывающей продукции, напр. в подгузниках)32) Химическое оружие: sampling and analysis plan, strategic action plan33) Трудовое право: Разрешение на доступ на рабочую площадку (Site Access Permit)34) Расширение файла: Session Announcement Protocol, System Assurance Program, Service Access Point (DEC), Systems, Applications and Products (company)35) Майкрософт: протокол SAP36) Общественная организация: Scholarship Assistance Program37) Должность: Substance Abuse Professionals38) Чат: Soft And Pretty39) NYSE. S A P, A. G.40) Аэропорты: San Pedro Sula, Honduras41) Программное обеспечение: System Analysis and Program Development, System Application Product42) Базы данных: Systems Applications Processing -
10 sap
1) Общая лексика: hum. сокр. Sensitive To Antimicrobial Peptides, hum. сокр. Slam Associated Protein, social action program, Site Access Permit (SEIC), старшее ответственное лицо (Senior Authorised Person, напр. http://www.indeed.co.uk/jobs?q=Senior+Authorised+Person&l=London)2) Компьютерная техника: System Application Program, Systems Application Products, Systems, Applications, and Products3) Медицина: statistical analysis plan, план статистического анализа, нарколог (substance abuse professional), substance abuse professional - нарколог (сокр.)4) Американизм: Scientific Advisory Panel, State Assessment Panel, Statements of Administration Policy, Statutory Adoption Pay, Stop All Progress, Substance Abuse Prevention5) Спорт: Slight Atari Player6) Военный термин: System Acquisition Plan, search and attack pattern, security assistance plan, security assistance program, semiarmor-piercing, shipboard antenna pedestal, standing air patrol, strategic advantages profile, structural analysis program, supervisory airplane pilot, system alignment procedure7) Техника: safety assessment principles, severe accident program, sintered aluminum powder, solar array program, startup administrative procedure, statements on auditing procedures, system acquisition process8) Шутливое выражение: Satan's Accounting Program, Slow And Painful, Somewhat Academic Privacy, Son Af a Pitch9) Религия: Share And Prayer10) Юридический термин: Special Assistance Pass, Substance Abuse Panel, Substance Abuse Program11) Бухгалтерия: Service Advertisement Protocol, Standard Accounting Procedures, Statements on Auditing Procedure, Systems Applications Products, Положения по процедурам аудита (Statements on Auditing Procedures), Принципы ведения бухгалтерскогоучёта, предписанные законом (Statutory Accounting Principles)
12) Страхование: Statutory Accounting Principals13) Автомобильный термин: Standard Corporate Protocol14) Грубое выражение: Stupid American Public, Surely A Pedophile15) Оптика: stress-applying part16) Телекоммуникации: протокол предлагаемых услуг, Service Advertising Protocol (NetWare), Service Access Point (generic)17) Сокращение: Seaborne Air Platform, Second Audio Program, Semi-Armour Piercing, Sensing And Processing unit, Shijiazhuang Aircraft Plant (China), Simulated Attack Profile, Soon As Possible, South African Police (South Africa), Special Access Program (USA), Special Access Program18) Университет: Satisfactory Academic Progress, Scientific Agricultural Partnership, Standard Assessment Performance, Student Assistance Program, Students Aid Project, Students Alumni And Professional, Supply Of Academic Publications19) Электроника: Secondary Audio Program20) Вычислительная техника: Service Access Point, Service Advertising Protocol, symbolic address program, symbolic assembly program, system assist processor, Symbolic Assembler Program (IBM, IBM 704), Session Announcement Protocol (Internet, RFC 2974), Service Advertising Protocol (Novell, Netware, IPX), Service Access Point (OSI), Service Access Point (OSI, Networking), Systems, Applications and Products (in data processing, ag, Hersteller), компания SAP, система компании SAP21) Нефть: An enterprise resource system, программы структурной перестройки, бухгалтерская программа SAP22) Иммунология: Serum Amyloid P23) Транспорт: Suitcase And Passport24) Фирменный знак: System Application And Products, System Application Products, Systems Applications And Programming, Systems, Applications and Products in Data Processing26) Деловая лексика: Safety Awareness Program, Systems Applications Production, описание процедуры отчётности, описание процедуры ревизии (Statement on Auditing Procedure)27) Глоссарий компании Сахалин Энерджи: System, Application and Products for Data Processing28) Образование: Science Activity Planner, Solves All Problems, Standard Assessment Procedure, Standard Assessment Program, State Advisory Panel for Special Education, Student Assistance Plan, Substance Abuse Professional29) Сетевые технологии: Service Announcement Protocol, Start Of Active Profile, System Area Pointer, протокол извещения об услугах, протокол объявления об услугах, протокол представления услуг, протокол рекламного сетевого сервиса, протокол с объявлением о служебных средствах31) Медицинская техника: Super Absorbent Polymer - впитывающий полимер (применяется во впитывающей продукции, напр. в подгузниках)32) Химическое оружие: sampling and analysis plan, strategic action plan33) Трудовое право: Разрешение на доступ на рабочую площадку (Site Access Permit)34) Расширение файла: Session Announcement Protocol, System Assurance Program, Service Access Point (DEC), Systems, Applications and Products (company)35) Майкрософт: протокол SAP36) Общественная организация: Scholarship Assistance Program37) Должность: Substance Abuse Professionals38) Чат: Soft And Pretty39) NYSE. S A P, A. G.40) Аэропорты: San Pedro Sula, Honduras41) Программное обеспечение: System Analysis and Program Development, System Application Product42) Базы данных: Systems Applications Processing -
11 go
1. intransitive verb,1) gehen; [Fahrzeug:] fahren; [Flugzeug:] fliegen; [Vierfüßer:] laufen; [Reptil:] kriechen; (on horseback etc.) reiten; (on skis, roller skates) laufen; (in wheelchair, pram, lift) fahrengo by bicycle/car/bus/train or rail/boat or sea or ship — mit dem [Fahr]rad/Auto/Bus/Zug/Schiff fahren
go by plane or air — fliegen
go on foot — zu Fuß gehen; laufen (ugs.)
as one goes [along] — (fig.) nach und nach
do something as one goes [along] — (lit.) etwas beim Gehen od. unterwegs tun
go on a journey — eine Reise machen; verreisen
go first-class/at 50 m.p.h. — erster Klasse reisen od. fahren/80 Stundenkilometer fahren
have far to go — weit zu gehen od. zu fahren haben; es weit haben
the doll/dog goes everywhere with her — sie hat immer ihre Puppe/ihren Hund dabei
who goes there? — (sentry's challenge) wer da?
there you go — (coll., giving something) bitte!; da! (ugs.)
2) (proceed as regards purpose, activity, destination, or route) [Bus, Zug, Lift, Schiff:] fahren; (use means of transportation) fahren; (fly) fliegen; (proceed on outward journey) weg-, abfahren; (travel regularly) [Verkehrsmittel:] verkehren (from... to zwischen + Dat.... und)his hand went to his pocket — er griff nach seiner Tasche
go to the toilet/cinema/moon/a museum/a funeral — auf die Toilette/ins Kino gehen/zum Mond fliegen/ins Museum/zu einer Beerdigung gehen
go to the doctor['s] — etc. zum Arzt usw. gehen
go [out] to China — nach China gehen
go [over] to America — nach Amerika [hinüber]fliegen/-fahren
go [off] to London — nach London [ab]fahren/[ab]fliegen
go this/that way — hier/da entlanggehen/-fahren
go out of one's way — einen Umweg machen; (fig.) keine Mühe scheuen
go towards something/somebody — auf etwas/jemanden zugehen
don't go on the grass — geh nicht auf den Rasen
go by something/somebody — [Festzug usw.:] an etwas/jemandem vorbeiziehen; [Bus usw.:] an etwas/jemandem vorbeifahren
go in and out [of something] — [in etwas (Dat.)] ein- und ausgehen
go into something — in etwas (Akk.) [hinein]gehen
go chasing after something/somebody — hinter etwas/jemandem herrennen (ugs.)
I went to water the garden — ich ging den Garten sprengen
go and do something — [gehen und] etwas tun
I'll go and get my coat — ich hole jetzt meinen Mantel
go and see whether... — nachsehen [gehen], ob...
go on a pilgrimage — etc. eine Pilgerfahrt usw. machen
go on TV/the radio — im Fernsehen/Radio auftreten
you go! — (to the phone) geh du mal ran!
let's go! — (coll.) fangen wir an!
here goes! — (coll.) dann mal los!
whose turn is it to go? — (in game) wer ist an der Reihe?
from the word go — (fig. coll.) [schon] von Anfang an
4) (pass, circulate, be transmitted) gehena shiver went up or down my spine — ein Schauer lief mir über den Rücken od. den Rücken hinunter
go to — (be given to) [Preis, Sieg, Gelder, Job:] gehen an (+ Akk.); [Titel, Krone, Besitz:] übergehen auf (+ Akk.); [Ehre, Verdienst:] zuteil werden (Dat.)
go towards — (be of benefit to) zugute kommen (+ Dat.)
go according to — (be determined by) sich richten nach
5) (make specific motion, do something specific)go round — [Rad:] sich drehen
there he etc. goes again — (coll.) da, schon wieder!
here we go again — (coll.) jetzt geht das wieder los!
6) (act, work, function effectively) gehen; [Mechanismus, Maschine:] laufenget the car to go — das Auto ankriegen (ugs.) od. starten
at midnight we were still going — um Mitternacht waren wir immer noch dabei od. im Gange
keep going — (in movement) weitergehen/-fahren; (in activity) weitermachen; (not fail) sich aufrecht halten
keep somebody going — (enable to continue) jemanden aufrecht halten
make something go, get/set something going — etwas in Gang bringen
7)go to church/school — in die Kirche/die Schule gehen
go to a comprehensive school — eine Gesamtschule besuchen; auf eine Gesamtschule gehen
8) (have recourse)go to the relevant authority/UN — sich an die zuständige Behörde/UN wenden
where do we go from here? — (fig.) und was nun? (ugs.)
9) (depart) gehen; [Bus, Zug:] [ab]fahren; [Post:] rausgehen (ugs.)I must be going now — ich muss allmählich gehen
time to go! — wir müssen/ihr müsst usw. gehen!
to go — (Amer.) [Speisen, Getränke:] zum Mitnehmen
10) (euphem.): (die) sterbenbe dead and gone — tot sein
11) (fail) [Gedächtnis, Kräfte:] nachlassen; (cease to function) kaputtgehen; [Maschine, Computer usw.:] ausfallen; [Sicherung:] durchbrennen; (break) brechen; [Seil usw.:] reißen; (collapse) einstürzen; (fray badly) ausfransen12) (disappear) verschwinden; [Geruch, Rauch:] sich verziehen; [Geld, Zeit:] draufgehen (ugs.) (in, on für); (be relinquished) aufgegeben werden; [Tradition:] abgeschafft werden; (be dismissed) [Arbeitskräfte:] entlassen werdenmy coat/the stain has gone — mein Mantel/der Fleck ist weg
where has my hat gone? — wo ist mein Hut [geblieben]?
13) (elapse) [Zeit:] vergehen; [Interview usw.:] vorüber-, vorbeigehen14)have something [still] to go — [noch] etwas übrig haben
one week etc. to go to... — noch eine Woche usw. bis...
there's only another mile to go — [es ist] nur noch eine Meile
still have a mile to go — noch eine Meile vor sich (Dat.) haben
one down, two to go — einer ist bereits erledigt, bleiben noch zwei übrig (salopp)
it went for £1 — es ging für 1 Pfund weg
16) (run) [Grenze, Straße usw.:] verlaufen, gehen; (afford access, lead) gehen; führen; (extend) reichen; (fig.) gehenas or so far as he/it goes — soweit
go against somebody/something — [Wahl, Kampf:] zu jemandes/einer Sache Ungunsten ausgehen; [Entscheidung, Urteil:] zu jemandes/einer Sache Ungunsten ausfallen
how did your holiday/party go? — wie war Ihr Urlaub/Ihre Party?
how is the book going? — was macht [denn] das Buch?
things have been going well/badly/smoothly — etc. in der letzten Zeit läuft alles gut/schief/glatt usw.
how are things going?, how is it going? — wie steht's od. (ugs.) läuft's?
18) (be, have form or nature, be in temporary state) sein; [Sprichwort, Gedicht, Titel:] lautenthis is how things go, that's the way it goes — so ist es nun mal
go against one's principles — gegen seine Prinzipien gehen
go hungry — hungern; hungrig bleiben
go without food/water — es ohne Essen/Wasser aushalten
go in fear of one's life — in beständiger Angst um sein Leben leben; see also academic.ru/31520/go_against">go against
19) (become) werdenthe constituency/York went Tory — der Wahlkreis/York ging an die Tories
where does the box go? — wo kommt od. gehört die Kiste hin?
where do you want this chair to go? — wo soll od. kommt der Stuhl hin?
21) (fit) passengo in[to] something — in etwas (Akk.) gehen od. [hinein]passen
go through something — durch etwas [hindurch]gehen od. [hindurch]passen
the two colours don't go — die beiden Farben passen nicht zusammen od. beißen sich
23) (serve, contribute) dienenthe qualities that go to make a leader — die Eigenschaften, die einen Führer ausmachen
it just goes to show that... — daran zeigt sich, dass...
There goes the bell. School is over — Es klingelt. Die Schule ist aus
the fire alarm went at 3 a. m. — der Feueralarm ging um 3 Uhr morgens los
25) as intensifier (coll.)don't go making or go and make him angry — verärgere ihn bloß nicht
don't go looking for trouble — such keinen Streit
I gave him a £10 note and, of course, he had to go and lose it — (iron.) ich gab ihm einen 10-Pfund-Schein, und er musste ihn natürlich prompt verlieren
now you've been and gone and done it! — (coll.) du hast ja was Schönes angerichtet! (ugs. iron.)
go tell him I'm ready — (coll./Amer.) geh und sag ihm, dass ich fertig bin
everything/anything goes — es ist alles erlaubt
2. transitive verb, forms asit/that goes without saying — es/das ist doch selbstverständlich
I1) (Cards) spielen2) (coll.)3. noungo it! — los!; weiter!
, pl. goes (coll.)have a go — es versuchen od. probieren
have a go at doing something — versuchen, etwas zu tun
have a go at something — sich an etwas (Dat.) versuchen
let me have/can I have a go? — lass mich [auch ein]mal/kann ich [auch ein]mal? (ugs.)
it's my go — ich bin an der Reihe od. dran
in two/three goes — bei zwei/drei Versuchen
2)have a go at somebody — (scold) sich (Dat.) jemanden vornehmen od. vorknöpfen (ugs.); (attack) über jemanden herfallen
3) (period of activity)he downed his beer in one go — er trank sein Bier in einem Zug aus
4) (energy) Schwung, derbe full of go — voller Schwung od. Elan sein
have plenty of go — einen enormen Schwung od. Elan haben
5) (vigorous activity)be on the go — auf Trab sein (ugs.)
6) (success)4. adjectiveit's no go — da ist nichts zu machen
(coll.)Phrasal Verbs:- go about- go after- go ahead- go along- go at- go away- go back- go by- go down- go for- go in- go into- go off- go on- go on to- go out- go over- go round- go under- go up- go with* * *[ɡəu] 1. 3rd person singular present tense - goes; verb1) (to walk, travel, move etc: He is going across the field; Go straight ahead; When did he go out?) gehen2) (to be sent, passed on etc: Complaints have to go through the proper channels.) gehen4) (to lead to: Where does this road go?) führen6) (to be destroyed etc: This wall will have to go.) verschwinden7) (to proceed, be done: The meeting went very well.) ablaufen8) (to move away: I think it is time you were going.) gehen9) (to disappear: My purse has gone!)10) (to do (some action or activity): I'm going for a walk; I'm going hiking next week-end.) im Begriff stehen, zu...11) (to fail etc: I think the clutch on this car has gone.) versagen12) (to be working etc: I don't think that clock is going.) gehen13) (to become: These apples have gone bad.) werden14) (to be: Many people in the world regularly go hungry.) sich befinden15) (to be put: Spoons go in that drawer.) gehören16) (to pass: Time goes quickly when you are enjoying yourself.) vorbeigehen17) (to be used: All her pocket-money goes on sweets.) draufgehen18) (to be acceptable etc: Anything goes in this office.) gehen20) (to have a particular tune etc: How does that song go?) gehen21) (to become successful etc: She always makes a party go.) erfolgreich2. noun1) (an attempt: I'm not sure how to do it, but I'll have a go.) der Versuch2) (energy: She's full of go.) der Schwung•- going3. adjective1) (successful: That shop is still a going concern.) gutgehend2) (in existence at present: the going rate for typing manuscripts.) bestehend•- go-ahead4. noun(permission: We'll start as soon as we get the go-ahead.) grünes Licht- go-getter- going-over
- goings-on
- no-go
- all go
- be going on for
- be going on
- be going strong
- from the word go
- get going
- give the go-by
- go about
- go after
- go against
- go along
- go along with
- go around
- go around with
- go at
- go back
- go back on
- go by
- go down
- go far
- go for
- go in
- go in for
- go into
- go off
- go on
- go on at
- go out
- go over
- go round
- go slow
- go steady
- go through
- go through with
- go too far
- go towards
- go up
- go up in smoke/flames
- go with
- go without
- keep going
- make a go of something
- make a go
- on the go* * *go[gəʊ, AM goʊ]<goes, went, gone>the bus \goes from Vaihingen to Sillenbuch der Bus verkehrt zwischen Vaihingen und Sillenbucha shiver went down my spine mir fuhr ein Schauer über den Rückenyou \go first! geh du zuerst!you \go next du bist als Nächste(r) dran!hey, I \go now he, jetzt bin ich dran! famthe doll \goes everywhere with him die Puppe nimmt er überallhin mitdrive to the end of the road, \go left, and... fahren Sie die Straße bis zum Ende entlang, biegen Sie dann links ab und...\go south till you get to the coast halte dich südlich, bis du zur Küste kommstwe have a long way to \go wir haben noch einen weiten Weg vor unswe've completed all of our goals — where do we \go from here? wir haben all unsere Ziele erreicht — wie geht es jetzt weiter?the train hooted as it went into the tunnel der Zug pfiff, als er in den Tunnel einfuhrwho \goes there? wer da?; (to dog)\go fetch it! hol'!▪ to \go towards sb/sth auf jdn/etw zugehento \go home nach Hause gehento \go to hospital/a party/prison/the toilet ins Krankenhaus/auf eine Party/ins Gefängnis/auf die Toilette gehento \go across to the pub rüber in die Kneipe gehen famto \go to sea zur See gehen famto \go across the street über die Straße gehento \go aboard/ashore an Bord/Land gehento \go below nach unten gehento \go below deck unter Deck gehento \go downhill ( also fig) bergab gehento have it far to \go es weit habento \go offstage [von der Bühne] abgehento \go round sich akk drehen2. (in order to get)could you \go into the kitchen and get me something to drink, please? könntest du bitte in die Küche gehen und mir was zu trinken holen?would you \go and get me some things from the supermarket? würdest du mir ein paar Sachen vom Supermarkt mitbringen?I just want to \go and have a look at that antique shop over there ich möchte nur schnell einen Blick in das Antiquitätengeschäft da drüben werfenwould you wait for me while I \go and fetch my coat? wartest du kurz auf mich, während ich meinen Mantel hole?I'll just \go and put my shoes on ich ziehe mir nur schnell die Schuhe on\go and wash your hands geh und wasch deine Händeshe's gone to meet Brian at the station sie ist Brian vom Bahnhof abholen gegangento \go and get some fresh air frische Luft schnappen gehento \go to see sb jdn aufsuchen3. (travel) reisenhave you ever gone to Africa before? warst du schon einmal in Afrika?to \go by bike/car/coach/train mit dem Fahrrad/Auto/Bus/Zug fahrento \go on a cruise eine Kreuzfahrt machento \go on [a] holiday in Urlaub gehento \go to Italy nach Italien fahrenlast year I went to Spain letztes Jahr war ich in Spaniento \go on a journey verreisen, eine Reise machento \go by plane fliegento \go on a trip eine Reise machento \go abroad ins Ausland gehen4. (disappear) stain, keys verschwindenwhere have my keys gone? wo sind meine Schlüssel hin?ah, my tummy ache is gone! ah, meine Bauchschmerzen sind weg!I really don't know where all my money \goes ich weiß auch nicht, wo mein ganzes Geld hinverschwindet!half of my salary \goes on rent die Hälfte meines Gehaltes geht für die Miete draufgone are the days when... vorbei sind die Zeiten, wo...here \goes my free weekend... das war's dann mit meinem freien Wochenende...all his money \goes on his car er steckt sein ganzes Geld in sein Autothere \goes another one! und wieder eine/einer weniger!hundreds of jobs will \go das wird Hunderte von Arbeitsplätzen kostenthe president will have to \go der Präsident wird seinen Hut nehmen müssenthat cat will have to \go die Katze muss verschwinden!all hope has gone jegliche Hoffnung ist geschwundenone of my books has gone adrift from my desk eines meiner Bücher ist von meinem Schreibtisch verschwundento \go missing BRIT, AUS verschwinden5. (leave) gehenwe have to \go now [or it's time to \go] wir müssen jetzt gehenI must be \going ich muss jetzt allmählich gehenhas she gone yet? ist sie noch da?the bus has gone der Bus ist schon weg; ( old)be gone! hinweg mit dir veraltetto let sth/sb \go, to let \go of sth/sb etw/jdn loslassen6. (do)to \go biking/jogging/shopping/swimming etc. Rad fahren/joggen/einkaufen/schwimmen etc. gehento \go looking for sb/sth jdn/etw suchen gehenif you \go telling all my secrets,... wenn du hergehst und alle meine Geheimnisse ausplauderst,...don't you dare \go crying to your mum about this untersteh dich, deswegen heulend zu deiner Mama zu laufen7. (attend)to \go to church/a concert in die Kirche/ins Konzert gehento \go to the doctor zum Arzt gehento \go to kindergarten/school/university in den Kindergarten/in die Schule/auf die Universität gehento \go on a pilgrimage auf Pilgerfahrt gehen8. (answer)9. (dress up)▪ to \go as sth witch, pirate als etw gehenwhat shall I \go in? als was soll ich gehen?the line has gone dead die Leitung ist totthe milk's gone sour die Milch ist sauerthe tyre has gone flat der Reifen ist plattmy mind suddenly went blank ich hatte plötzlich wie ein Brett vorm Kopf slI always \go red when I'm embarrassed ich werde immer rot, wenn mir etwas peinlich isthe described the new regulations as bureaucracy gone mad er bezeichnete die neuen Bestimmungen als Ausgeburt einer wild gewordenen BürokratieI went cold mir wurde kaltshe's gone Communist sie ist jetzt Kommunistinhe's gone all environmental er macht jetzt voll auf Öko famto \go bad food schlecht werdento \go bald/grey kahl/grau werdento \go bankrupt bankrottgehento \go public an die Öffentlichkeit treten; STOCKEX an die Börse gehento \go to sleep einschlafento \go hungry hungernto \go thirsty dursten, durstig sein ÖSTERRto \go unmentioned/unnoticed/unsolved unerwähnt/unbemerkt/ungelöst bleiben12. (turn out) gehenhow did your party \go? und, wie war deine Party?how's your thesis \going? was macht deine Doktorarbeit?how are things \going? und, wie läuft's? famif everything \goes well... wenn alles gutgeht...things have gone well es ist gut gelaufenthe way things \go wie das halt so gehtthe way things are \going at the moment... so wie es im Moment aussieht...to \go according to plan nach Plan laufento \go from bad to worse vom Regen in die Traufe kommento \go against/for sb election zu jds Ungunsten/Gunsten ausgehento \go wrong schiefgehen, schieflaufen fam13. (pass) vergehen, verstreichentime seems to \go faster as you get older die Zeit scheint schneller zu vergehen, wenn man älter wirdonly two days to \go... nur noch zwei Tage...one week to \go till Christmas noch eine Woche bis Weihnachtenin days gone by in längst vergangenen Zeitentwo exams down, one to \go zwei Prüfungen sind schon geschafft, jetzt noch eine, dann ist es geschafft!I've three years to \go before I can retire mir fehlen noch drei Jahre bis zur Rente!14. (begin) anfangenready to \go? bist du bereit?one, two, three, \go! eins, zwei, drei, los!we really must get \going with these proposals wir müssen uns jetzt echt an diese Konzepte setzenlet's \go! los!here \goes! jetzt geht's los!our computer is \going unser Computer gibt seinen Geist auf hum fammy jeans is gone at the knees meine Jeans ist an den Knien durchgescheuerther mind is \going sie baut geistig ganz schön ab! fam16. (die) sterbenshe went peacefully in her sleep sie starb friedlich im Schlaf17. (belong) hingehörenI'll put it away if you tell me where it \goes ich räum's weg, wenn du mir sagst, wo es hingehörtthe silverware \goes in the drawer over there das Silber kommt in die Schublade da drübenthose tools \go in the garage diese Werkzeuge gehören in die Garagethat is to \go into my account das kommt auf mein Kontowhere do you want that to \go? wo soll das hin?that \goes under a different chapter das gehört in ein anderes Kapitel18. (be awarded)Manchester went to Labour Manchester ging an Labour19. (lead) road führenwhere does this trail \go? wohin führt dieser Pfad?20. (extend) gehenthe meadow \goes all the way down to the road die Weide erstreckt sich bis hinunter zur Straßeyour idea is good enough, as far as it \goes... deine Idee ist so weit ganz gut,...the numbers on the paper \go from 1 to 10 die Nummern auf dem Blatt gehen von 1 bis 1021. (in auction) gehenI'll \go as high as £200 ich gehe bis zu 200 Pfundour business has been \going for twenty years unser Geschäft läuft seit zwanzig JahrenI'm not saying anything as long as the tape recorder is \going ich sage gar nichts, solange das Tonbandgerät läuftto get sth \going [or to \go] [or to make sth \go] etw in Gang bringento get a party \going eine Party in Fahrt bringencome on! keep \going! ja, weiter! famto keep sth \going etw in Gang halten; factory in Betrieb haltento keep a conversation \going eine Unterhaltung am Laufen haltento keep a fire \going ein Feuer am Brennen haltenthat thought kept me \going dieser Gedanke ließ mich durchhaltenhere's some food to keep you \going hier hast du erst mal was zu essen23. (have recourse) gehento \go to the police zur Polizei gehento \go to war in den Krieg ziehen24. (match, be in accordance)these two colours don't \go diese beiden Farben beißen sichto \go against logic unlogisch seinto \go against one's principles gegen jds Prinzipien verstoßen25. (fit)five \goes into ten two times [or five into ten \goes twice] fünf geht zweimal in zehndo you think all these things will \go into our little suitcase? glaubst du, das ganze Zeug wird in unseren kleinen Koffer passen? fam\going, \going, gone! zum Ersten, zum Zweiten, [und] zum Dritten!pocketbooks are \going for $10 for the next two days in den nächsten zwei Tagen sind die Taschenbücher für 10 Dollar zu haben▪ to \go to sb an jdn gehento be \going cheap billig zu haben sein27. (serve, contribute)the money will \go to the victims of the earthquake das Geld ist für die Erdbebenopfer bestimmtthis will \go towards your holiday das [Geld] ist für deinen Urlaub bestimmtyour daughter's attitude only \goes to prove how much... die Einstellung deiner Tochter zeigt einmal mehr, wie sehr...28. (move) machenwhen I \go like this, my hand hurts wenn ich so mache, tut meine Hand weh\go like this with your hand to show that... mach so mit deiner Hand, um zu zeigen, dass...29. (sound) machenI think I heard the doorbell \go just now ich glaube, es hat gerade geklingeltthere \goes the bell es klingeltducks \go ‘quack’ Enten machen ‚quack‘with sirens \going ambulance mit heulender Sirene30. (accepted)anything \goes alles ist erlaubtthat \goes for all of you das gilt für euch alle!I can never remember how that song \goes ich weiß nie, wie dieses Lied gehtthe story \goes that... es heißt, dass...the rumour \goes that... es geht das Gerücht, dass...32. (compared to)as hospitals/things \go verglichen mit anderen Krankenhäusern/Dingenas things \go today it wasn't that expensive für heutige Verhältnisse war es gar nicht so teuerI really have to \go ich muss ganz dringend mal! famI've gone and lost my earring ich habe meinen Ohrring verloren\go to hell! geh [o scher dich] zum Teufel! famdo you want that pizza here or to \go? möchten Sie die Pizza hier essen oder mitnehmen?; AMI'd like a cheeseburger to \go, please ich hätte gerne einen Cheeseburger zum Mitnehmen36. (available)is there any beer \going? gibt es Bier?I'll have whatever is \going ich nehme das, was gerade da istto \go easy on sb jdn schonend behandeln, jdn glimpflich davonkommen lassen38.▶ to \go all out to do sth alles daransetzen, etw zu tun▶ to \go Dutch getrennt zahlen▶ that \goes without saying das versteht sich von selbstII. AUXILIARY VERB▪ to be \going to do sth etw tun werdenwe are \going to have a party tomorrow wir geben morgen eine Partyhe was \going to phone me this morning er wollte mich heute Morgen anrufenisn't she \going to accept the job after all? nimmt sie den Job nun doch nicht an?III. TRANSITIVE VERB<goes, went, gone>▪ to \go sth a route, a highway etw nehmen▪ to \go sth:she \goes to me: I never want to see you again! sie sagt zu mir: ich will dich nie wieder sehen!3. CARDS▪ to \go sth etw reizento \go nap die höchste Zahl von Stichen ansagen5. (become)▪ to \go sth:my mind went a complete blank ich hatte voll ein Brett vorm Kopf! fam6.▶ to \go it alone etw im Alleingang tun▶ to \go it ( fam) es toll treiben fam; (move quickly) ein tolles Tempo drauf haben; (work hard) sich akk reinknien▶ to \go a long way lange [vor]halten▶ sb will \go a long way jd wird es weit bringen▶ to \go nap alles auf eine Karte setzenIV. NOUN<pl -es>1. (turn)I'll have a \go at driving if you're tired ich kann dich mit dem Fahren ablösen, wenn du müde bist famyou've had your \go already! du warst schon dran!hey, it's Ken's \go now he, jetzt ist Ken drancan I have a \go? darf ich mal?to miss one \go einmal aussetzen; (not voluntarily) einmal übersprungen werdenhave a \go! versuch' es doch einfach mal! famall in one \go alle[s] auf einmalat the first \go auf Anhiebto give sth a \go etw versuchenhis boss had a \go at him about his appearance sein Chef hat sich ihn wegen seines Äußeren vorgeknöpft fammembers of the public are strongly advised not to have a \go at this man die Öffentlichkeit wird eindringlich davor gewarnt, etwas gegen diesen Mann zu unternehmento have a \go at doing sth versuchen, etw zu tunto have several \goes at sth für etw akk mehrere Anläufe nehmento be full of \go voller Elan seinshe had such a bad \go of the flu that she took a week off from work sie hatte so eine schlimme Grippe, dass sie eine Woche in Krankenstand gingit's all \go here hier ist immer was los famit's all \go and no relaxing on those bus tours auf diesen Busfahrten wird nur gehetzt und man kommt nie zum Ausruhen famI've got two projects on the \go at the moment ich habe momentan zwei Projekte gleichzeitig laufento be on the \go [ständig] auf Trab seinto keep sb on the \go jdn auf Trab halten fam6.she's making a \go of her new antique shop ihr neues Antiquitätengeschäft ist ein voller Erfolg fam▶ that was a near \go das war knapp▶ it's no \go da ist nichts zu machen▶ from the word \go von Anfang anV. ADJECTIVEpred [start]klar, in Ordnungall systems [are] \go alles klarall systems \go, take-off in t minus 10 alle Systeme zeigen grün, Start in t minus 10* * *go1 [ɡəʊ]A pl goes [ɡəʊz] s1. Gehen n:on the go umga) (ständig) in Bewegung oder auf Achseb) obs im Verfall begriffen, im Dahinschwinden;from the word go umg von Anfang an2. Gang m, (Ver)Lauf m3. umg Schwung m, Schmiss m umg:he is full of go er hat Schwung, er ist voller Leben4. umg Mode f:it is all the go now es ist jetzt große Mode5. umg Erfolg m:make a go of sth etwas zu einem Erfolg machen;a) kein Erfolg,b) aussichts-, zwecklos;it’s no go es geht nicht, nichts zu machen6. umg Abmachung f:it’s a go! abgemacht!7. umg Versuch m:have a go at sth etwas probieren oder versuchen;let me have a go lass mich mal (probieren)!;have a go at sb jemandem was zu hören geben umg;at one go auf einen Schlag, auf Anhieb;in one go auf einen Sitz;at the first go gleich beim ersten Versuch;it’s your go du bist an der Reihe oder dranwhat a go! ’ne schöne Geschichte oder Bescherung!, so was Dummes!;it was a near go das ging gerade noch (einmal) gut9. umga) Portion f (einer Speise)b) Glas n:his third go of brandy sein dritter Kognak10. Anfall m (einer Krankheit):my second go of influenza meine zweite GrippeB adj TECH umg funktionstüchtigC v/i prät went [went], pperf gone [ɡɒn; US ɡɔːn], 3. sg präs goes [ɡəʊz]1. gehen, fahren, reisen ( alle:to nach), sich (fort)bewegen:go on foot zu Fuß gehen;go to Paris nach Paris reisen oder gehen;people were coming and going Leute kamen und gingen;who goes there? MIL wer da?;3. verkehren, fahren (Fahrzeuge)4. anfangen, loslegen, -gehen:go! SPORT los!;go to it! mach dich dran!, ran! (beide umg);here you go again! jetzt fängst du schon wieder an!;just go and try versuchs doch mal!;here goes! umg dann mal los!, ran (an den Speck)!5. gehen, führen (to nach):6. sich erstrecken, reichen, gehen (to bis):the belt does not go round her waist der Gürtel geht oder reicht nicht um ihre Taille;as far as it goes bis zu einem gewissen Grade;it goes a long way es reicht lange (aus)7. fig gehen:let it go at that lass es dabei bewenden; → all Bes Redew, anywhere 1, court A 10, expense Bes Redew, far Bes Redew, heart Bes Redew, nowhere A 29. gehen, passen ( beide:it does not go into my pocket es geht oder passt nicht in meine Tasche;12 inches go to the foot 12 Zoll gehen auf oder bilden einen Fuß10. gehören (in, into in akk; on auf akk):the books go on the shelf die Bücher gehören in oder kommen auf das Regal;where does this go? wohin kommt das?the money is going to a good cause das Geld fließt einem guten Zweck zu oder kommt einem guten Zweck zugute!12. TECH gehen, laufen, funktionieren (alle auch fig):keep (set) sth going etwas in Gang halten (bringen);your coffee will go cold dein Kaffee wird kalt;go blind erblinden;14. (gewöhnlich) (in einem Zustand) sein, sich ständig befinden:go armed bewaffnet sein;go in rags ständig in Lumpen herumlaufen;go hungry hungern;17. sich halten (by, on, upon an akk), gehen, handeln, sich richten, urteilen (on, upon nach):have nothing to go upon keine Anhaltspunkte haben;going by her clothes ihrer Kleidung nach (zu urteilen)18. umgehen, kursieren, im Umlauf sein (Gerüchte etc):the story goes that … es heißt oder man erzählt sich, dass …19. gelten ( for für):what he says goes umg was er sagt, gilt;that goes for all of you das gilt für euch alle;it goes without saying es versteht sich von selbst, (es ist) selbstverständlich20. gehen, laufen, bekannt sein:my dog goes by the name of Rover mein Hund hört auf den Namen Rover21. as hotels go im Vergleich zu anderen Hotels;he’s a meek man, as men go er ist ein vergleichsweise sanftmütiger Mann22. vergehen, -streichen:how time goes! wie (doch) die Zeit vergeht!;one minute to go noch eine Minute;with five minutes to go SPORT fünf Minuten vor Spielendeat, for für):“everything must go” „Totalausverkauf“;24. (on, in) aufgehen (in dat), ausgegeben werden (für):all his money goes on drink er gibt sein ganzes Geld für Alkohol aus25. dazu beitragen oder dienen ( to do zu tun), dienen (to zu), verwendet werden (to, toward[s] für, zu):it goes to show dies zeigt, daran erkennt man;this only goes to show you the truth dies dient nur dazu, Ihnen die Wahrheit zu zeigen26. verlaufen, sich entwickeln oder gestalten:how does the play go? wie geht oder welchen Erfolg hat das Stück?;things have gone badly with me es ist mir schlecht ergangen27. ausgehen, -fallen:the decision went against him die Entscheidung fiel zu seinen Ungunsten aus;it went well es ging gut (aus)28. Erfolg haben:go big umg ein Riesenerfolg sein29. (with) gehen, sich vertragen, harmonieren (mit), passen (zu):the clock went five die Uhr schlug fünf;the doorbell went es klingelte oder läutete31. mit einem Knall etc losgehen:bang went the gun die Kanone machte bumm32. lauten (Worte etc):I forget how the words go mir fällt der Text im Moment nicht ein;this is how the tune goes so geht die Melodie;this song goes to the tune of … dieses Lied geht nach der Melodie von …33. gehen, verschwinden, abgeschafft werden:he must go er muss weg;these laws must go die Gesetze müssen verschwinden34. (dahin)schwinden:my eyesight is going meine Augen werden immer schlechter35. zum Erliegen kommen, zusammenbrechen (Handel etc)36. kaputtgehen (Sohlen etc)37. sterben38. (im ppr mit inf) zum Ausdruck einer Zukunft, besondershe is going to read it er wird oder will es (bald) lesen;she is going to have a baby sie bekommt ein Kind;what was going to be done? was sollte nun geschehen?39. (mit nachfolgendem ger) meist gehen:go swimming schwimmen gehen;you must not go telling him du darfst es ihm ja nicht sagen;he goes frightening people er erschreckt immer die Leute40. (daran)gehen, sich aufmachen oder anschicken:he went to find him er ging ihn suchen;she went to see him sie besuchte ihn;go fetch! bring es!, hol es!;he went and sold it umg er hat es tatsächlich verkauft; er war so dumm, es zu verkaufen41. “pizzas to go” (Schild) US „Pizzas zum Mitnehmen“42. erlaubt sein:everything goes in this place hier ist alles erlaubt43. besonders US umg wiegen:I went 90 kilos last year letztes Jahr hatte ich 90 KiloD v/t1. einen Weg, eine Strecke etc gehen3. Kartenspiel: ansagenI’ll go you! ich nehme an!, gemacht!a) sich reinknien, (mächtig) rangehen,b) es toll treiben, auf den Putz hauen,c) handeln:go it alone einen Alleingang machen;go it! ran!, (immer) feste! umggo2 [ɡəʊ] Go n (japanisches Brettspiel)* * *1. intransitive verb,1) gehen; [Fahrzeug:] fahren; [Flugzeug:] fliegen; [Vierfüßer:] laufen; [Reptil:] kriechen; (on horseback etc.) reiten; (on skis, roller skates) laufen; (in wheelchair, pram, lift) fahrengo by bicycle/car/bus/train or rail/boat or sea or ship — mit dem [Fahr]rad/Auto/Bus/Zug/Schiff fahren
go by plane or air — fliegen
go on foot — zu Fuß gehen; laufen (ugs.)
as one goes [along] — (fig.) nach und nach
do something as one goes [along] — (lit.) etwas beim Gehen od. unterwegs tun
go on a journey — eine Reise machen; verreisen
go first-class/at 50 m.p.h. — erster Klasse reisen od. fahren/80 Stundenkilometer fahren
have far to go — weit zu gehen od. zu fahren haben; es weit haben
the doll/dog goes everywhere with her — sie hat immer ihre Puppe/ihren Hund dabei
who goes there? — (sentry's challenge) wer da?
there you go — (coll., giving something) bitte!; da! (ugs.)
2) (proceed as regards purpose, activity, destination, or route) [Bus, Zug, Lift, Schiff:] fahren; (use means of transportation) fahren; (fly) fliegen; (proceed on outward journey) weg-, abfahren; (travel regularly) [Verkehrsmittel:] verkehren (from... to zwischen + Dat.... und)go to the toilet/cinema/moon/a museum/a funeral — auf die Toilette/ins Kino gehen/zum Mond fliegen/ins Museum/zu einer Beerdigung gehen
go to the doctor['s] — etc. zum Arzt usw. gehen
go [out] to China — nach China gehen
go [over] to America — nach Amerika [hinüber]fliegen/-fahren
go [off] to London — nach London [ab]fahren/[ab]fliegen
go this/that way — hier/da entlanggehen/-fahren
go out of one's way — einen Umweg machen; (fig.) keine Mühe scheuen
go towards something/somebody — auf etwas/jemanden zugehen
go by something/somebody — [Festzug usw.:] an etwas/jemandem vorbeiziehen; [Bus usw.:] an etwas/jemandem vorbeifahren
go in and out [of something] — [in etwas (Dat.)] ein- und ausgehen
go into something — in etwas (Akk.) [hinein]gehen
go chasing after something/somebody — hinter etwas/jemandem herrennen (ugs.)
go and do something — [gehen und] etwas tun
go and see whether... — nachsehen [gehen], ob...
go on a pilgrimage — etc. eine Pilgerfahrt usw. machen
go on TV/the radio — im Fernsehen/Radio auftreten
I'll go! — ich geh schon!; (answer phone) ich geh ran od. nehme ab; (answer door) ich mache auf
you go! — (to the phone) geh du mal ran!
3) (start) losgehen; (in vehicle) losfahrenlet's go! — (coll.) fangen wir an!
here goes! — (coll.) dann mal los!
whose turn is it to go? — (in game) wer ist an der Reihe?
from the word go — (fig. coll.) [schon] von Anfang an
4) (pass, circulate, be transmitted) gehena shiver went up or down my spine — ein Schauer lief mir über den Rücken od. den Rücken hinunter
go to — (be given to) [Preis, Sieg, Gelder, Job:] gehen an (+ Akk.); [Titel, Krone, Besitz:] übergehen auf (+ Akk.); [Ehre, Verdienst:] zuteil werden (Dat.)
go towards — (be of benefit to) zugute kommen (+ Dat.)
go according to — (be determined by) sich richten nach
5) (make specific motion, do something specific)go round — [Rad:] sich drehen
there he etc. goes again — (coll.) da, schon wieder!
here we go again — (coll.) jetzt geht das wieder los!
6) (act, work, function effectively) gehen; [Mechanismus, Maschine:] laufenget the car to go — das Auto ankriegen (ugs.) od. starten
keep going — (in movement) weitergehen/-fahren; (in activity) weitermachen; (not fail) sich aufrecht halten
keep somebody going — (enable to continue) jemanden aufrecht halten
make something go, get/set something going — etwas in Gang bringen
7)go to — (attend)
go to church/school — in die Kirche/die Schule gehen
go to a comprehensive school — eine Gesamtschule besuchen; auf eine Gesamtschule gehen
go to the relevant authority/UN — sich an die zuständige Behörde/UN wenden
where do we go from here? — (fig.) und was nun? (ugs.)
9) (depart) gehen; [Bus, Zug:] [ab]fahren; [Post:] rausgehen (ugs.)time to go! — wir müssen/ihr müsst usw. gehen!
to go — (Amer.) [Speisen, Getränke:] zum Mitnehmen
10) (euphem.): (die) sterben11) (fail) [Gedächtnis, Kräfte:] nachlassen; (cease to function) kaputtgehen; [Maschine, Computer usw.:] ausfallen; [Sicherung:] durchbrennen; (break) brechen; [Seil usw.:] reißen; (collapse) einstürzen; (fray badly) ausfransen12) (disappear) verschwinden; [Geruch, Rauch:] sich verziehen; [Geld, Zeit:] draufgehen (ugs.) (in, on für); (be relinquished) aufgegeben werden; [Tradition:] abgeschafft werden; (be dismissed) [Arbeitskräfte:] entlassen werdenmy coat/the stain has gone — mein Mantel/der Fleck ist weg
where has my hat gone? — wo ist mein Hut [geblieben]?
13) (elapse) [Zeit:] vergehen; [Interview usw.:] vorüber-, vorbeigehen14)to go — (still remaining)
have something [still] to go — [noch] etwas übrig haben
one week etc. to go to... — noch eine Woche usw. bis...
there's only another mile to go — [es ist] nur noch eine Meile
still have a mile to go — noch eine Meile vor sich (Dat.) haben
one down, two to go — einer ist bereits erledigt, bleiben noch zwei übrig (salopp)
15) (be sold) weggehen (ugs.); verkauft werdenit went for £1 — es ging für 1 Pfund weg
16) (run) [Grenze, Straße usw.:] verlaufen, gehen; (afford access, lead) gehen; führen; (extend) reichen; (fig.) gehenas or so far as he/it goes — soweit
17) (turn out, progress) [Ereignis, Projekt, Interview, Abend:] verlaufengo against somebody/something — [Wahl, Kampf:] zu jemandes/einer Sache Ungunsten ausgehen; [Entscheidung, Urteil:] zu jemandes/einer Sache Ungunsten ausfallen
how did your holiday/party go? — wie war Ihr Urlaub/Ihre Party?
how is the book going? — was macht [denn] das Buch?
things have been going well/badly/smoothly — etc. in der letzten Zeit läuft alles gut/schief/glatt usw.
how are things going?, how is it going? — wie steht's od. (ugs.) läuft's?
18) (be, have form or nature, be in temporary state) sein; [Sprichwort, Gedicht, Titel:] lautenthis is how things go, that's the way it goes — so ist es nun mal
go hungry — hungern; hungrig bleiben
go without food/water — es ohne Essen/Wasser aushalten
go in fear of one's life — in beständiger Angst um sein Leben leben; see also go against
19) (become) werdenthe constituency/York went Tory — der Wahlkreis/York ging an die Tories
20) (have usual place) kommen; (belong) gehörenwhere does the box go? — wo kommt od. gehört die Kiste hin?
where do you want this chair to go? — wo soll od. kommt der Stuhl hin?
21) (fit) passengo in[to] something — in etwas (Akk.) gehen od. [hinein]passen
go through something — durch etwas [hindurch]gehen od. [hindurch]passen
22) (harmonize, match) passen ( with zu)the two colours don't go — die beiden Farben passen nicht zusammen od. beißen sich
23) (serve, contribute) dienenthe qualities that go to make a leader — die Eigenschaften, die einen Führer ausmachen
it just goes to show that... — daran zeigt sich, dass...
24) (make sound of specified kind) machen; (emit sound) [Turmuhr, Gong:] schlagen; [Glocke:] läutenThere goes the bell. School is over — Es klingelt. Die Schule ist aus
the fire alarm went at 3 a. m. — der Feueralarm ging um 3 Uhr morgens los
25) as intensifier (coll.)don't go making or go and make him angry — verärgere ihn bloß nicht
I gave him a £10 note and, of course, he had to go and lose it — (iron.) ich gab ihm einen 10-Pfund-Schein, und er musste ihn natürlich prompt verlieren
now you've been and gone and done it! — (coll.) du hast ja was Schönes angerichtet! (ugs. iron.)
go tell him I'm ready — (coll./Amer.) geh und sag ihm, dass ich fertig bin
everything/anything goes — es ist alles erlaubt
2. transitive verb, forms asit/that goes without saying — es/das ist doch selbstverständlich
I1) (Cards) spielen2) (coll.)go it — es toll treiben; (work hard) rangehen
3. noungo it! — los!; weiter!
, pl. goes (coll.)have a go — es versuchen od. probieren
have a go at doing something — versuchen, etwas zu tun
have a go at something — sich an etwas (Dat.) versuchen
let me have/can I have a go? — lass mich [auch ein]mal/kann ich [auch ein]mal? (ugs.)
it's my go — ich bin an der Reihe od. dran
in two/three goes — bei zwei/drei Versuchen
2)have a go at somebody — (scold) sich (Dat.) jemanden vornehmen od. vorknöpfen (ugs.); (attack) über jemanden herfallen
4) (energy) Schwung, derbe full of go — voller Schwung od. Elan sein
have plenty of go — einen enormen Schwung od. Elan haben
be on the go — auf Trab sein (ugs.)
6) (success)4. adjective(coll.)Phrasal Verbs:- go about- go after- go ahead- go along- go at- go away- go back- go by- go down- go for- go in- go into- go off- go on- go on to- go out- go over- go round- go under- go up- go with* * *(deer-) stalking expr.auf die Pirsch gehen ausdr. v.(§ p.,p.p.: went, gone)= funktionieren v.führen v.gehen v.(§ p.,pp.: ging, ist gegangen) -
12 Artificial Intelligence
In my opinion, none of [these programs] does even remote justice to the complexity of human mental processes. Unlike men, "artificially intelligent" programs tend to be single minded, undistractable, and unemotional. (Neisser, 1967, p. 9)Future progress in [artificial intelligence] will depend on the development of both practical and theoretical knowledge.... As regards theoretical knowledge, some have sought a unified theory of artificial intelligence. My view is that artificial intelligence is (or soon will be) an engineering discipline since its primary goal is to build things. (Nilsson, 1971, pp. vii-viii)Most workers in AI [artificial intelligence] research and in related fields confess to a pronounced feeling of disappointment in what has been achieved in the last 25 years. Workers entered the field around 1950, and even around 1960, with high hopes that are very far from being realized in 1972. In no part of the field have the discoveries made so far produced the major impact that was then promised.... In the meantime, claims and predictions regarding the potential results of AI research had been publicized which went even farther than the expectations of the majority of workers in the field, whose embarrassments have been added to by the lamentable failure of such inflated predictions....When able and respected scientists write in letters to the present author that AI, the major goal of computing science, represents "another step in the general process of evolution"; that possibilities in the 1980s include an all-purpose intelligence on a human-scale knowledge base; that awe-inspiring possibilities suggest themselves based on machine intelligence exceeding human intelligence by the year 2000 [one has the right to be skeptical]. (Lighthill, 1972, p. 17)4) Just as Astronomy Succeeded Astrology, the Discovery of Intellectual Processes in Machines Should Lead to a Science, EventuallyJust as astronomy succeeded astrology, following Kepler's discovery of planetary regularities, the discoveries of these many principles in empirical explorations on intellectual processes in machines should lead to a science, eventually. (Minsky & Papert, 1973, p. 11)5) Problems in Machine Intelligence Arise Because Things Obvious to Any Person Are Not Represented in the ProgramMany problems arise in experiments on machine intelligence because things obvious to any person are not represented in any program. One can pull with a string, but one cannot push with one.... Simple facts like these caused serious problems when Charniak attempted to extend Bobrow's "Student" program to more realistic applications, and they have not been faced up to until now. (Minsky & Papert, 1973, p. 77)What do we mean by [a symbolic] "description"? We do not mean to suggest that our descriptions must be made of strings of ordinary language words (although they might be). The simplest kind of description is a structure in which some features of a situation are represented by single ("primitive") symbols, and relations between those features are represented by other symbols-or by other features of the way the description is put together. (Minsky & Papert, 1973, p. 11)[AI is] the use of computer programs and programming techniques to cast light on the principles of intelligence in general and human thought in particular. (Boden, 1977, p. 5)The word you look for and hardly ever see in the early AI literature is the word knowledge. They didn't believe you have to know anything, you could always rework it all.... In fact 1967 is the turning point in my mind when there was enough feeling that the old ideas of general principles had to go.... I came up with an argument for what I called the primacy of expertise, and at the time I called the other guys the generalists. (Moses, quoted in McCorduck, 1979, pp. 228-229)9) Artificial Intelligence Is Psychology in a Particularly Pure and Abstract FormThe basic idea of cognitive science is that intelligent beings are semantic engines-in other words, automatic formal systems with interpretations under which they consistently make sense. We can now see why this includes psychology and artificial intelligence on a more or less equal footing: people and intelligent computers (if and when there are any) turn out to be merely different manifestations of the same underlying phenomenon. Moreover, with universal hardware, any semantic engine can in principle be formally imitated by a computer if only the right program can be found. And that will guarantee semantic imitation as well, since (given the appropriate formal behavior) the semantics is "taking care of itself" anyway. Thus we also see why, from this perspective, artificial intelligence can be regarded as psychology in a particularly pure and abstract form. The same fundamental structures are under investigation, but in AI, all the relevant parameters are under direct experimental control (in the programming), without any messy physiology or ethics to get in the way. (Haugeland, 1981b, p. 31)There are many different kinds of reasoning one might imagine:Formal reasoning involves the syntactic manipulation of data structures to deduce new ones following prespecified rules of inference. Mathematical logic is the archetypical formal representation. Procedural reasoning uses simulation to answer questions and solve problems. When we use a program to answer What is the sum of 3 and 4? it uses, or "runs," a procedural model of arithmetic. Reasoning by analogy seems to be a very natural mode of thought for humans but, so far, difficult to accomplish in AI programs. The idea is that when you ask the question Can robins fly? the system might reason that "robins are like sparrows, and I know that sparrows can fly, so robins probably can fly."Generalization and abstraction are also natural reasoning process for humans that are difficult to pin down well enough to implement in a program. If one knows that Robins have wings, that Sparrows have wings, and that Blue jays have wings, eventually one will believe that All birds have wings. This capability may be at the core of most human learning, but it has not yet become a useful technique in AI.... Meta- level reasoning is demonstrated by the way one answers the question What is Paul Newman's telephone number? You might reason that "if I knew Paul Newman's number, I would know that I knew it, because it is a notable fact." This involves using "knowledge about what you know," in particular, about the extent of your knowledge and about the importance of certain facts. Recent research in psychology and AI indicates that meta-level reasoning may play a central role in human cognitive processing. (Barr & Feigenbaum, 1981, pp. 146-147)Suffice it to say that programs already exist that can do things-or, at the very least, appear to be beginning to do things-which ill-informed critics have asserted a priori to be impossible. Examples include: perceiving in a holistic as opposed to an atomistic way; using language creatively; translating sensibly from one language to another by way of a language-neutral semantic representation; planning acts in a broad and sketchy fashion, the details being decided only in execution; distinguishing between different species of emotional reaction according to the psychological context of the subject. (Boden, 1981, p. 33)Can the synthesis of Man and Machine ever be stable, or will the purely organic component become such a hindrance that it has to be discarded? If this eventually happens-and I have... good reasons for thinking that it must-we have nothing to regret and certainly nothing to fear. (Clarke, 1984, p. 243)The thesis of GOFAI... is not that the processes underlying intelligence can be described symbolically... but that they are symbolic. (Haugeland, 1985, p. 113)14) Artificial Intelligence Provides a Useful Approach to Psychological and Psychiatric Theory FormationIt is all very well formulating psychological and psychiatric theories verbally but, when using natural language (even technical jargon), it is difficult to recognise when a theory is complete; oversights are all too easily made, gaps too readily left. This is a point which is generally recognised to be true and it is for precisely this reason that the behavioural sciences attempt to follow the natural sciences in using "classical" mathematics as a more rigorous descriptive language. However, it is an unfortunate fact that, with a few notable exceptions, there has been a marked lack of success in this application. It is my belief that a different approach-a different mathematics-is needed, and that AI provides just this approach. (Hand, quoted in Hand, 1985, pp. 6-7)We might distinguish among four kinds of AI.Research of this kind involves building and programming computers to perform tasks which, to paraphrase Marvin Minsky, would require intelligence if they were done by us. Researchers in nonpsychological AI make no claims whatsoever about the psychological realism of their programs or the devices they build, that is, about whether or not computers perform tasks as humans do.Research here is guided by the view that the computer is a useful tool in the study of mind. In particular, we can write computer programs or build devices that simulate alleged psychological processes in humans and then test our predictions about how the alleged processes work. We can weave these programs and devices together with other programs and devices that simulate different alleged mental processes and thereby test the degree to which the AI system as a whole simulates human mentality. According to weak psychological AI, working with computer models is a way of refining and testing hypotheses about processes that are allegedly realized in human minds.... According to this view, our minds are computers and therefore can be duplicated by other computers. Sherry Turkle writes that the "real ambition is of mythic proportions, making a general purpose intelligence, a mind." (Turkle, 1984, p. 240) The authors of a major text announce that "the ultimate goal of AI research is to build a person or, more humbly, an animal." (Charniak & McDermott, 1985, p. 7)Research in this field, like strong psychological AI, takes seriously the functionalist view that mentality can be realized in many different types of physical devices. Suprapsychological AI, however, accuses strong psychological AI of being chauvinisticof being only interested in human intelligence! Suprapsychological AI claims to be interested in all the conceivable ways intelligence can be realized. (Flanagan, 1991, pp. 241-242)16) Determination of Relevance of Rules in Particular ContextsEven if the [rules] were stored in a context-free form the computer still couldn't use them. To do that the computer requires rules enabling it to draw on just those [ rules] which are relevant in each particular context. Determination of relevance will have to be based on further facts and rules, but the question will again arise as to which facts and rules are relevant for making each particular determination. One could always invoke further facts and rules to answer this question, but of course these must be only the relevant ones. And so it goes. It seems that AI workers will never be able to get started here unless they can settle the problem of relevance beforehand by cataloguing types of context and listing just those facts which are relevant in each. (Dreyfus & Dreyfus, 1986, p. 80)Perhaps the single most important idea to artificial intelligence is that there is no fundamental difference between form and content, that meaning can be captured in a set of symbols such as a semantic net. (G. Johnson, 1986, p. 250)Artificial intelligence is based on the assumption that the mind can be described as some kind of formal system manipulating symbols that stand for things in the world. Thus it doesn't matter what the brain is made of, or what it uses for tokens in the great game of thinking. Using an equivalent set of tokens and rules, we can do thinking with a digital computer, just as we can play chess using cups, salt and pepper shakers, knives, forks, and spoons. Using the right software, one system (the mind) can be mapped into the other (the computer). (G. Johnson, 1986, p. 250)19) A Statement of the Primary and Secondary Purposes of Artificial IntelligenceThe primary goal of Artificial Intelligence is to make machines smarter.The secondary goals of Artificial Intelligence are to understand what intelligence is (the Nobel laureate purpose) and to make machines more useful (the entrepreneurial purpose). (Winston, 1987, p. 1)The theoretical ideas of older branches of engineering are captured in the language of mathematics. We contend that mathematical logic provides the basis for theory in AI. Although many computer scientists already count logic as fundamental to computer science in general, we put forward an even stronger form of the logic-is-important argument....AI deals mainly with the problem of representing and using declarative (as opposed to procedural) knowledge. Declarative knowledge is the kind that is expressed as sentences, and AI needs a language in which to state these sentences. Because the languages in which this knowledge usually is originally captured (natural languages such as English) are not suitable for computer representations, some other language with the appropriate properties must be used. It turns out, we think, that the appropriate properties include at least those that have been uppermost in the minds of logicians in their development of logical languages such as the predicate calculus. Thus, we think that any language for expressing knowledge in AI systems must be at least as expressive as the first-order predicate calculus. (Genesereth & Nilsson, 1987, p. viii)21) Perceptual Structures Can Be Represented as Lists of Elementary PropositionsIn artificial intelligence studies, perceptual structures are represented as assemblages of description lists, the elementary components of which are propositions asserting that certain relations hold among elements. (Chase & Simon, 1988, p. 490)Artificial intelligence (AI) is sometimes defined as the study of how to build and/or program computers to enable them to do the sorts of things that minds can do. Some of these things are commonly regarded as requiring intelligence: offering a medical diagnosis and/or prescription, giving legal or scientific advice, proving theorems in logic or mathematics. Others are not, because they can be done by all normal adults irrespective of educational background (and sometimes by non-human animals too), and typically involve no conscious control: seeing things in sunlight and shadows, finding a path through cluttered terrain, fitting pegs into holes, speaking one's own native tongue, and using one's common sense. Because it covers AI research dealing with both these classes of mental capacity, this definition is preferable to one describing AI as making computers do "things that would require intelligence if done by people." However, it presupposes that computers could do what minds can do, that they might really diagnose, advise, infer, and understand. One could avoid this problematic assumption (and also side-step questions about whether computers do things in the same way as we do) by defining AI instead as "the development of computers whose observable performance has features which in humans we would attribute to mental processes." This bland characterization would be acceptable to some AI workers, especially amongst those focusing on the production of technological tools for commercial purposes. But many others would favour a more controversial definition, seeing AI as the science of intelligence in general-or, more accurately, as the intellectual core of cognitive science. As such, its goal is to provide a systematic theory that can explain (and perhaps enable us to replicate) both the general categories of intentionality and the diverse psychological capacities grounded in them. (Boden, 1990b, pp. 1-2)Because the ability to store data somewhat corresponds to what we call memory in human beings, and because the ability to follow logical procedures somewhat corresponds to what we call reasoning in human beings, many members of the cult have concluded that what computers do somewhat corresponds to what we call thinking. It is no great difficulty to persuade the general public of that conclusion since computers process data very fast in small spaces well below the level of visibility; they do not look like other machines when they are at work. They seem to be running along as smoothly and silently as the brain does when it remembers and reasons and thinks. On the other hand, those who design and build computers know exactly how the machines are working down in the hidden depths of their semiconductors. Computers can be taken apart, scrutinized, and put back together. Their activities can be tracked, analyzed, measured, and thus clearly understood-which is far from possible with the brain. This gives rise to the tempting assumption on the part of the builders and designers that computers can tell us something about brains, indeed, that the computer can serve as a model of the mind, which then comes to be seen as some manner of information processing machine, and possibly not as good at the job as the machine. (Roszak, 1994, pp. xiv-xv)The inner workings of the human mind are far more intricate than the most complicated systems of modern technology. Researchers in the field of artificial intelligence have been attempting to develop programs that will enable computers to display intelligent behavior. Although this field has been an active one for more than thirty-five years and has had many notable successes, AI researchers still do not know how to create a program that matches human intelligence. No existing program can recall facts, solve problems, reason, learn, and process language with human facility. This lack of success has occurred not because computers are inferior to human brains but rather because we do not yet know in sufficient detail how intelligence is organized in the brain. (Anderson, 1995, p. 2)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Artificial Intelligence
-
13 Categories
Two general and basic principles are proposed for the formation of categories: The first has to do with the function of category systems and asserts that the task of category systems is to provide maximum information with the least cognitive effort [("cognitive economy")]; the second has to do with the structure of the information so provided and asserts that the perceived world comes as structured information rather than than arbitrary or unpredictable attributes [("perceived world structure")]. Thus maximum information with least cognitive effort is achieved if categories map the perceived world structure as closely as possible. This condition can be achieved either by the mapping of categories to given attribute structures or by the definition or redefinition of attributes to render a given set of categories appropriately structured. (Rosch, 1978, p. 28)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Categories
-
14 near cash
!гос. фин. The resource budget contains a separate control total for “near cash” expenditure, that is expenditure such as pay and current grants which impacts directly on the measure of the golden rule.This paper provides background information on the framework for the planning and control of public expenditure in the UK which has been operated since the 1998 Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR). It sets out the different classifications of spending for budgeting purposes and why these distinctions have been adopted. It discusses how the public expenditure framework is designed to ensure both sound public finances and an outcome-focused approach to public expenditure.The UK's public spending framework is based on several key principles:"consistency with a long-term, prudent and transparent regime for managing the public finances as a whole;" "the judgement of success by policy outcomes rather than resource inputs;" "strong incentives for departments and their partners in service delivery to plan over several years and plan together where appropriate so as to deliver better public services with greater cost effectiveness; and"the proper costing and management of capital assets to provide the right incentives for public investment.The Government sets policy to meet two firm fiscal rules:"the Golden Rule states that over the economic cycle, the Government will borrow only to invest and not to fund current spending; and"the Sustainable Investment Rule states that net public debt as a proportion of GDP will be held over the economic cycle at a stable and prudent level. Other things being equal, net debt will be maintained below 40 per cent of GDP over the economic cycle.Achievement of the fiscal rules is assessed by reference to the national accounts, which are produced by the Office for National Statistics, acting as an independent agency. The Government sets its spending envelope to comply with these fiscal rules.Departmental Expenditure Limits ( DEL) and Annually Managed Expenditure (AME)"Departmental Expenditure Limit ( DEL) spending, which is planned and controlled on a three year basis in Spending Reviews; and"Annually Managed Expenditure ( AME), which is expenditure which cannot reasonably be subject to firm, multi-year limits in the same way as DEL. AME includes social security benefits, local authority self-financed expenditure, debt interest, and payments to EU institutions.More information about DEL and AME is set out below.In Spending Reviews, firm DEL plans are set for departments for three years. To ensure consistency with the Government's fiscal rules departments are set separate resource (current) and capital budgets. The resource budget contains a separate control total for “near cash” expenditure, that is expenditure such as pay and current grants which impacts directly on the measure of the golden rule.To encourage departments to plan over the medium term departments may carry forward unspent DEL provision from one year into the next and, subject to the normal tests for tautness and realism of plans, may be drawn down in future years. This end-year flexibility also removes any incentive for departments to use up their provision as the year end approaches with less regard to value for money. For the full benefits of this flexibility and of three year plans to feed through into improved public service delivery, end-year flexibility and three year budgets should be cascaded from departments to executive agencies and other budget holders.Three year budgets and end-year flexibility give those managing public services the stability to plan their operations on a sensible time scale. Further, the system means that departments cannot seek to bid up funds each year (before 1997, three year plans were set and reviewed in annual Public Expenditure Surveys). So the credibility of medium-term plans has been enhanced at both central and departmental level.Departments have certainty over the budgetary allocation over the medium term and these multi-year DEL plans are strictly enforced. Departments are expected to prioritise competing pressures and fund these within their overall annual limits, as set in Spending Reviews. So the DEL system provides a strong incentive to control costs and maximise value for money.There is a small centrally held DEL Reserve. Support from the Reserve is available only for genuinely unforeseeable contingencies which departments cannot be expected to manage within their DEL.AME typically consists of programmes which are large, volatile and demand-led, and which therefore cannot reasonably be subject to firm multi-year limits. The biggest single element is social security spending. Other items include tax credits, Local Authority Self Financed Expenditure, Scottish Executive spending financed by non-domestic rates, and spending financed from the proceeds of the National Lottery.AME is reviewed twice a year as part of the Budget and Pre-Budget Report process reflecting the close integration of the tax and benefit system, which was enhanced by the introduction of tax credits.AME is not subject to the same three year expenditure limits as DEL, but is still part of the overall envelope for public expenditure. Affordability is taken into account when policy decisions affecting AME are made. The Government has committed itself not to take policy measures which are likely to have the effect of increasing social security or other elements of AME without taking steps to ensure that the effects of those decisions can be accommodated prudently within the Government's fiscal rules.Given an overall envelope for public spending, forecasts of AME affect the level of resources available for DEL spending. Cautious estimates and the AME margin are built in to these AME forecasts and reduce the risk of overspending on AME.Together, DEL plus AME sum to Total Managed Expenditure (TME). TME is a measure drawn from national accounts. It represents the current and capital spending of the public sector. The public sector is made up of central government, local government and public corporations.Resource and Capital Budgets are set in terms of accruals information. Accruals information measures resources as they are consumed rather than when the cash is paid. So for example the Resource Budget includes a charge for depreciation, a measure of the consumption or wearing out of capital assets."Non cash charges in budgets do not impact directly on the fiscal framework. That may be because the national accounts use a different way of measuring the same thing, for example in the case of the depreciation of departmental assets. Or it may be that the national accounts measure something different: for example, resource budgets include a cost of capital charge reflecting the opportunity cost of holding capital; the national accounts include debt interest."Within the Resource Budget DEL, departments have separate controls on:"Near cash spending, the sub set of Resource Budgets which impacts directly on the Golden Rule; and"The amount of their Resource Budget DEL that departments may spend on running themselves (e.g. paying most civil servants’ salaries) is limited by Administration Budgets, which are set in Spending Reviews. Administration Budgets are used to ensure that as much money as practicable is available for front line services and programmes. These budgets also help to drive efficiency improvements in departments’ own activities. Administration Budgets exclude the costs of frontline services delivered directly by departments.The Budget preceding a Spending Review sets an overall envelope for public spending that is consistent with the fiscal rules for the period covered by the Spending Review. In the Spending Review, the Budget AME forecast for year one of the Spending Review period is updated, and AME forecasts are made for the later years of the Spending Review period.The 1998 Comprehensive Spending Review ( CSR), which was published in July 1998, was a comprehensive review of departmental aims and objectives alongside a zero-based analysis of each spending programme to determine the best way of delivering the Government's objectives. The 1998 CSR allocated substantial additional resources to the Government's key priorities, particularly education and health, for the three year period from 1999-2000 to 2001-02.Delivering better public services does not just depend on how much money the Government spends, but also on how well it spends it. Therefore the 1998 CSR introduced Public Service Agreements (PSAs). Each major government department was given its own PSA setting out clear targets for achievements in terms of public service improvements.The 1998 CSR also introduced the DEL/ AME framework for the control of public spending, and made other framework changes. Building on the investment and reforms delivered by the 1998 CSR, successive spending reviews in 2000, 2002 and 2004 have:"provided significant increase in resources for the Government’s priorities, in particular health and education, and cross-cutting themes such as raising productivity; extending opportunity; and building strong and secure communities;" "enabled the Government significantly to increase investment in public assets and address the legacy of under investment from past decades. Departmental Investment Strategies were introduced in SR2000. As a result there has been a steady increase in public sector net investment from less than ¾ of a per cent of GDP in 1997-98 to 2¼ per cent of GDP in 2005-06, providing better infrastructure across public services;" "introduced further refinements to the performance management framework. PSA targets have been reduced in number over successive spending reviews from around 300 to 110 to give greater focus to the Government’s highest priorities. The targets have become increasingly outcome-focused to deliver further improvements in key areas of public service delivery across Government. They have also been refined in line with the conclusions of the Devolving Decision Making Review to provide a framework which encourages greater devolution and local flexibility. Technical Notes were introduced in SR2000 explaining how performance against each PSA target will be measured; and"not only allocated near cash spending to departments, but also – since SR2002 - set Resource DEL plans for non cash spending.To identify what further investments and reforms are needed to equip the UK for the global challenges of the decade ahead, on 19 July 2005 the Chief Secretary to the Treasury announced that the Government intends to launch a second Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) reporting in 2007.A decade on from the first CSR, the 2007 CSR will represent a long-term and fundamental review of government expenditure. It will cover departmental allocations for 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010 11. Allocations for 2007-08 will be held to the agreed figures already announced by the 2004 Spending Review. To provide a rigorous analytical framework for these departmental allocations, the Government will be taking forward a programme of preparatory work over 2006 involving:"an assessment of what the sustained increases in spending and reforms to public service delivery have achieved since the first CSR. The assessment will inform the setting of new objectives for the decade ahead;" "an examination of the key long-term trends and challenges that will shape the next decade – including demographic and socio-economic change, globalisation, climate and environmental change, global insecurity and technological change – together with an assessment of how public services will need to respond;" "to release the resources needed to address these challenges, and to continue to secure maximum value for money from public spending over the CSR period, a set of zero-based reviews of departments’ baseline expenditure to assess its effectiveness in delivering the Government’s long-term objectives; together with"further development of the efficiency programme, building on the cross cutting areas identified in the Gershon Review, to embed and extend ongoing efficiency savings into departmental expenditure planning.The 2007 CSR also offers the opportunity to continue to refine the PSA framework so that it drives effective delivery and the attainment of ambitious national standards.Public Service Agreements (PSAs) were introduced in the 1998 CSR. They set out agreed targets detailing the outputs and outcomes departments are expected to deliver with the resources allocated to them. The new spending regime places a strong emphasis on outcome targets, for example in providing for better health and higher educational standards or service standards. The introduction in SR2004 of PSA ‘standards’ will ensure that high standards in priority areas are maintained.The Government monitors progress against PSA targets, and departments report in detail twice a year in their annual Departmental Reports (published in spring) and in their autumn performance reports. These reports provide Parliament and the public with regular updates on departments’ performance against their targets.Technical Notes explain how performance against each PSA target will be measured.To make the most of both new investment and existing assets, there needs to be a coherent long term strategy against which investment decisions are taken. Departmental Investment Strategies (DIS) set out each department's plans to deliver the scale and quality of capital stock needed to underpin its objectives. The DIS includes information about the department's existing capital stock and future plans for that stock, as well as plans for new investment. It also sets out the systems that the department has in place to ensure that it delivers its capital programmes effectively.This document was updated on 19 December 2005.Near-cash resource expenditure that has a related cash implication, even though the timing of the cash payment may be slightly different. For example, expenditure on gas or electricity supply is incurred as the fuel is used, though the cash payment might be made in arrears on aquarterly basis. Other examples of near-cash expenditure are: pay, rental.Net cash requirement the upper limit agreed by Parliament on the cash which a department may draw from theConsolidated Fund to finance the expenditure within the ambit of its Request forResources. It is equal to the agreed amount of net resources and net capital less non-cashitems and working capital.Non-cash cost costs where there is no cash transaction but which are included in a body’s accounts (or taken into account in charging for a service) to establish the true cost of all the resourcesused.Non-departmental a body which has a role in the processes of government, but is not a government public body, NDPBdepartment or part of one. NDPBs accordingly operate at arm’s length from governmentMinisters.Notional cost of a cost which is taken into account in setting fees and charges to improve comparability with insuranceprivate sector service providers.The charge takes account of the fact that public bodies donot generally pay an insurance premium to a commercial insurer.the independent body responsible for collecting and publishing official statistics about theUK’s society and economy. (At the time of going to print legislation was progressing tochange this body to the Statistics Board).Office of Government an office of the Treasury, with a status similar to that of an agency, which aims to maximise Commerce, OGCthe government’s purchasing power for routine items and combine professional expertiseto bear on capital projects.Office of the the government department responsible for discharging the Paymaster General’s statutoryPaymaster General,responsibilities to hold accounts and make payments for government departments and OPGother public bodies.Orange bookthe informal title for Management of Risks: Principles and Concepts, which is published by theTreasury for the guidance of public sector bodies.Office for NationalStatistics, ONS60Managing Public Money————————————————————————————————————————"GLOSSARYOverdraftan account with a negative balance.Parliament’s formal agreement to authorise an activity or expenditure.Prerogative powerspowers exercisable under the Royal Prerogative, ie powers which are unique to the Crown,as contrasted with common-law powers which may be available to the Crown on the samebasis as to natural persons.Primary legislationActs which have been passed by the Westminster Parliament and, where they haveappropriate powers, the Scottish Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly. Begin asBills until they have received Royal Assent.arrangements under which a public sector organisation contracts with a private sectorentity to construct a facility and provide associated services of a specified quality over asustained period. See annex 7.5.Proprietythe principle that patterns of resource consumption should respect Parliament’s intentions,conventions and control procedures, including any laid down by the PAC. See box 2.4.Public Accountssee Committee of Public Accounts.CommitteePublic corporationa trading body controlled by central government, local authority or other publiccorporation that has substantial day to day operating independence. See section 7.8.Public Dividend finance provided by government to public sector bodies as an equity stake; an alternative to Capital, PDCloan finance.Public Service sets out what the public can expect the government to deliver with its resources. EveryAgreement, PSAlarge government department has PSA(s) which specify deliverables as targets or aimsrelated to objectives.a structured arrangement between a public sector and a private sector organisation tosecure an outcome delivering good value for money for the public sector. It is classified tothe public or private sector according to which has more control.Rate of returnthe financial remuneration delivered by a particular project or enterprise, expressed as apercentage of the net assets employed.Regularitythe principle that resource consumption should accord with the relevant legislation, therelevant delegated authority and this document. See box 2.4.Request for the functional level into which departmental Estimates may be split. RfRs contain a number Resources, RfRof functions being carried out by the department in pursuit of one or more of thatdepartment’s objectives.Resource accountan accruals account produced in line with the Financial Reporting Manual (FReM).Resource accountingthe system under which budgets, Estimates and accounts are constructed in a similar wayto commercial audited accounts, so that both plans and records of expenditure allow in fullfor the goods and services which are to be, or have been, consumed – ie not just the cashexpended.Resource budgetthe means by which the government plans and controls the expenditure of resources tomeet its objectives.Restitutiona legal concept which allows money and property to be returned to its rightful owner. Ittypically operates where another person can be said to have been unjustly enriched byreceiving such monies.Return on capital the ratio of profit to capital employed of an accounting entity during an identified period.employed, ROCEVarious measures of profit and of capital employed may be used in calculating the ratio.Public Privatepartnership, PPPPrivate Finance Initiative, PFIParliamentaryauthority61Managing Public Money"————————————————————————————————————————GLOSSARYRoyal charterthe document setting out the powers and constitution of a corporation established underprerogative power of the monarch acting on Privy Council advice.Second readingthe second formal time that a House of Parliament may debate a bill, although in practicethe first substantive debate on its content. If successful, it is deemed to denoteParliamentary approval of the principle of the proposed legislation.Secondary legislationlaws, including orders and regulations, which are made using powers in primary legislation.Normally used to set out technical and administrative provision in greater detail thanprimary legislation, they are subject to a less intense level of scrutiny in Parliament.European legislation is,however,often implemented in secondary legislation using powers inthe European Communities Act 1972.Service-level agreement between parties, setting out in detail the level of service to be performed.agreementWhere agreements are between central government bodies, they are not legally a contractbut have a similar function.Shareholder Executive a body created to improve the government’s performance as a shareholder in businesses.Spending reviewsets out the key improvements in public services that the public can expect over a givenperiod. It includes a thorough review of departmental aims and objectives to find the bestway of delivering the government’s objectives, and sets out the spending plans for the givenperiod.State aidstate support for a domestic body or company which could distort EU competition and sois not usually allowed. See annex 4.9.Statement of Excessa formal statement detailing departments’ overspends prepared by the Comptroller andAuditor General as a result of undertaking annual audits.Statement on Internal an annual statement that Accounting Officers are required to make as part of the accounts Control, SICon a range of risk and control issues.Subheadindividual elements of departmental expenditure identifiable in Estimates as single cells, forexample cell A1 being administration costs within a particular line of departmental spending.Supplyresources voted by Parliament in response to Estimates, for expenditure by governmentdepartments.Supply Estimatesa statement of the resources the government needs in the coming financial year, and forwhat purpose(s), by which Parliamentary authority is sought for the planned level ofexpenditure and income.Target rate of returnthe rate of return required of a project or enterprise over a given period, usually at least a year.Third sectorprivate sector bodies which do not act commercially,including charities,social and voluntaryorganisations and other not-for-profit collectives. See annex 7.7.Total Managed a Treasury budgeting term which covers all current and capital spending carried out by the Expenditure,TMEpublic sector (ie not just by central departments).Trading fundan organisation (either within a government department or forming one) which is largely orwholly financed from commercial revenue generated by its activities. Its Estimate shows itsnet impact, allowing its income from receipts to be devoted entirely to its business.Treasury Minutea formal administrative document drawn up by the Treasury, which may serve a wide varietyof purposes including seeking Parliamentary approval for the use of receipts asappropriations in aid, a remission of some or all of the principal of voted loans, andresponding on behalf of the government to reports by the Public Accounts Committee(PAC).62Managing Public Money————————————————————————————————————————GLOSSARY63Managing Public MoneyValue for moneythe process under which organisation’s procurement, projects and processes aresystematically evaluated and assessed to provide confidence about suitability, effectiveness,prudence,quality,value and avoidance of error and other waste,judged for the public sectoras a whole.Virementthe process through which funds are moved between subheads such that additionalexpenditure on one is met by savings on one or more others.Votethe process by which Parliament approves funds in response to supply Estimates.Voted expenditureprovision for expenditure that has been authorised by Parliament. Parliament ‘votes’authority for public expenditure through the Supply Estimates process. Most expenditureby central government departments is authorised in this way.Wider market activity activities undertaken by central government organisations outside their statutory duties,using spare capacity and aimed at generating a commercial profit. See annex 7.6.Windfallmonies received by a department which were not anticipated in the spending review.———————————————————————————————————————— -
15 Language
Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)[A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling itSolving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into anotherLANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own LanguageThe forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)[It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human InteractionLanguage cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language
-
16 Article 71
The jurisdiction of the Russian Federation includes:a) adoption and amending of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws, control over their observance;b) federal structure and the territory of the Russian Federation; c) regulation and protection of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen; citizenship in the Russian Federation, regulation and protection of the rights of national minorities; d) establishment of the system of federal bodies of legislative, executive and judicial authority, the rules of their organization and activities, formation of federal bodies of state authority; e) federal state property and its management; f) establishment of the principles of federal policy and federal programmes in the sphere of state, economic, ecological, social, cultural and national development of the Russian Federation; g) establishment of legal groups for a single market; financial, currency, credit, and customs regulation, money issue, the principles of pricing policy; federal economic services, including federal banks; h) federal budget, federal taxes and dues, federal funds of regional development; i) federal power systems, nuclear power-engineering, fission materials, federal transport, railways, information and communication, outer space activities; j) foreign policy and international relations of the Russian Federation, international treaties and agreements of the Russian Federation, issues of war and peace; k) foreign economic relations of the Russian Federation; l) defence and security; military production; determination of rules of selling and purchasing weapons, ammunition, military equipment and other military property; production of poisonous substances, narcotic substances and rules of their use; m) determination of the status and protection of the state border, territorial sea, air space, exclusive economic zone and continental shelf of the expenditures; n) judicial system, procurator's office, criminal, criminal procedure and criminal-executive legislation, amnesty and pardoning, civil, civil procedure and arbitration procedure legislation, legal regulation of intellectual property; o) federal law of conflict of laws; p) meteorological service, standards, metric system, horometry accounting, geodesy and cartography, names of geographical units, official statistics and accounting; q) state awards and honourary titles of the Russian Federation; r) federal state service.__________<На русском языке см. [ref dict="The Constitution of Russia (Russian)"]Статья 71[/ref]> <На немецком языке см. [ref dict="The Constitution of Russia (German)"]Artikel 71[/ref]> <На французском языке см. [ref dict="The Constitution of Russia (French)"]Article 71[/ref]>The Constitution of Russia. English-Russian dictionary > Article 71
-
17 Black, Harold Stephen
[br]b. 14 April 1898 Leominster, Massachusetts, USAd. 11 December 1983 Summitt, New Jersey, USA[br]American electrical engineer who discovered that the application of negative feedback to amplifiers improved their stability and reduced distortion.[br]Black graduated from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, in 1921 and joined the Western Electric Company laboratories (later the Bell Telephone Laboratories) in New York City. There he worked on a variety of electronic-communication problems. His major contribution was the discovery in 1927 that the application of negative feedback to an amplifier, whereby a fraction of the output signal is fed back to the input in the opposite phase, not only increases the stability of the amplifier but also has the effect of reducing the magnitude of any distortion introduced by it. This discovery has found wide application in the design of audio hi-fi amplifiers and various control systems, and has also given valuable insight into the way in which many animal control functions operate.During the Second World War he developed a form of pulse code modulation (PCM) to provide a practicable, secure telephony system for the US Army Signal Corps. From 1963–6, after his retirement from the Bell Labs, he was Principal Research Scientist with General Precision Inc., Little Falls, New Jersey, following which he became an independent consultant in communications. At the time of his death he held over 300 patents.[br]Principal Honours and DistinctionsInstitute of Electronic and Radio Engineers Lamme Medal 1957.Bibliography1934, "Stabilised feedback amplifiers", Electrical Engineering 53:114 (describes the principles of negative feedback).21 December 1937, US patent no. 2,106,671 (for his negative feedback discovery.1947, with J.O.Edson, "Pulse code modulation", Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 66:895.1946, "A multichannel microwave radio relay system", Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 65:798.1953, Modulation Theory, New York: D.van Nostrand.1988, Laboratory Management: Principles \& Practice, New York: Van Nostrand Rheinhold.Further ReadingFor early biographical details see "Harold S. Black, 1957 Lamme Medalist", Electrical Engineering (1958) 77:720; "H.S.Black", Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Spectrum (1977) 54.KF -
18 Voigt, Paul Gustavus Adolphus Helmuth
[br]b. 9 December 1901 Forest Hill, London, Englandd. 9 February 1981 Brighton, Ontario, Canada[br]English/Canadian electronics engineer, developer of electromechanical recording and reproductions systems, amplifiers and loudspeakers.[br]He received his education at Dulwich College and in 1922 graduated with a BSc from University College, London. He had an early interest in the application of valve amplifiers, and after graduating he was employed by J.E.Hough, Edison Bell Works, to develop a line of radio-receiving equipment. However, he became interested in the mechanical (and later electrical) side of recording and from 1925 developed principles and equipment. In particular he developed capacitor microphones, not only for in-house work but also commercially, until the mid-1930s. The Edison Bell company did not survive the Depression and closed in 1933. Voigt founded his own company, Voigt Patents Ltd, concentrating on loudspeakers for cinemas and developing horn loudspeakers for domestic use. During the Second World War he continued to develop loudspeaker units and gramophone pick-ups, and in 1950 he emigrated to Toronto, Canada, but his company closed. Voigt taught electronics, and from 1960 to 1969 he was employed by the Radio Regulations Laboratory in Ottawa. After retirement he worked with theoretical cosmology and fundamental interactions.[br]BibliographyMost of Voigt's patents are concerned with improvements in the magnetic circuit in dynamic loudspeakers and centring devices for diaphragms. However, UK patent nos. 278,098, 404,037 and 447,749 may be regarded as particularly relevant. In 1940 Voigt contributed a remarkable paper on the principles of equalization in mechanical recording: "Getting the best from records, part 1—the recording characteristic", Wireless World (February): 141–4.Further ReadingPersonal accounts of experiences with Voigt may be found in "Paul Voigt's contribution to Audio", British Kinematography Sound and Television (October 1970): 316–27, which also includes a list of his patents.GB-NBiographical history of technology > Voigt, Paul Gustavus Adolphus Helmuth
-
19 SP
1) Общая лексика: hum. сокр. Salvation Plan, specifications, поставщик услуг (бизнес, заключение договора), обслуживающая компания, обслуживающая организация2) Компьютерная техника: Single Processor, Stops Processing3) Медицина: sodium phosphate (фосфат натрия)4) Американизм: Semi Plenary, Special Publication5) Ботаника: Soil Properties6) Спорт: Sanity Points, Save Percentage, Short Program, Shoulder Pad, Single Play, Single Player, Spirit Points, Sports Plane, Sports Production, Starting Pitcher, Style Points, Subgame Perfect, Super Player7) Военный термин: Sabotage Pack, Security Pack, Security Policy, Shock Practice, Source Program, Special Proceeding, school of photography, seaplane, secret publication, security police, security policeman, security publication, self-propelled, sensor package, service pistol, service policeman, service publication, shipping port, shore party, sign post, signal post, signal processor, signal publication, single-purpose, smokeless powder, soft-point, spare part, spares planning, special performance, special planning, special program, special project, special projective, special propellants, special-purpose, specialist, splinter-protected, standard practice, standard procedure, standing procedure, start point, stragglers' post, strategic plan, strategic planning, strategic program, stretcher party, student pilot, submarine patrol, summary plotter, supply point, support publication, surveillance procedure, system parameter, systems planning8) Техника: Silk Purse, Silver Plated, Something Probably, Special Product, Square Pod, safety principles, sampling point, satellite processor, saturation paste, saturation percentage, security procedure, self-potential, separator, set point, short-period, shotpoint, signal projector, single pole, single-processor, solar panel, solidification point, space character, span value, stand pipe, star photometer, starting period, stellar photometry, superpressure, suppression pool, suspended particles9) Сельское хозяйство: superphosphate10) Шутливое выражение: Super Pud11) Химия: Solubility Product12) Математика: свойство вычитания (subtraction property), случайный процесс (stochastic process)13) Религия: Saint Peter, Supreme Power14) Железнодорожный термин: Union Pacific Railroad Company15) Юридический термин: State Police, Street Price16) Бухгалтерия: sales proceeds, selling price17) Автомобильный термин: запаска, запасное колесо, запчасть (spare part, обычно именно про колесо)18) Грубое выражение: Sex Partner, Shit Pot, Sneaky Peek, Stinky Poop, Stupid Parents, Stupid Party, Stupid Piece, Stupid Prat, Stupidly Priced, Sucky Piece19) Металлургия: straight polarity20) Телевидение: standart play21) Телекоммуникации: Signaling Point (ANSI)22) Сокращение: Civil aircraft marking (Poland), Satellite Photo, Shore Patrol (USA), Shore Patrol, Single-Phase, Smart Procurement (UK MoD), Socialist Party, Southern Pacific, Spain (NATO country code), Spotting round, Stabilised Platform, Star Patrol, Static Pressure, one-pole, sample part, seaplane port, shear plate, single-pole, spare, spare parts, species, specification, speed, splitting, stake and platform, standpipe, stop of payment, structured protection, supply, Short Play (VHS VCR), special (projectile)23) Университет: Satisfactory Progress, Student Program, Sure Pass24) Физиология: Sleep Paralysis, Spine, spinal25) Вычислительная техника: Signaling Point, Speculative Precomputation, Speech Processing, Structured Programming, System Product, semipermanent, shift pulse, sound parameters, square punch, параметры звука, Southern Pacific (Corporate name, Railroading), Service Provider (DMI), SPare (IMEI, GSM, Mobile-Systems), Simple visual Profile (MPEG), Service Pack (MS, Windows, NT), Service Processor (Power4, IBM, IC), Stack Pointer (register, CPU, Intel, Assembler)26) Нефть: (Vcl) clay content deduced from spontaneous potential (SP) log, bbl separator barrel, curve spontaneous polarization curve, reflected wave, self potential, set plug, shot point, shot points, slightly porous, spontaneous polarization, straddle packer, surface pressure, давление на устье скважины (surface pressure), естественный потенциал (self-potential), короткопериодный (short-period), место перфорирования, нормальное давление (safe pressure), пункт взрыва (shotpoint), сдвоенный пакер (straddle packer), точка взрыва (shot point), точка возбуждения (shot point), установка временной мостовой пробки (set plug), Spontaneous Potential Log27) Банковское дело: приостанавливать платёж (stop payment)28) Геофизика: ПВ, ПС, потенциал самопроизвольной поляризации29) Пищевая промышленность: Sugar Pie30) Силикатное производство: softening point, suspension preheater31) Воздухоплавание: Supervisory Package32) Фирменный знак: Simple Productions, Sprague33) СМИ: Special Presentation, Studio Package, Suggested Page34) Деловая лексика: Semidirect Product, Single Premium, Special Partner, Special Process, Starting Price35) Бурение: СП (spontaneous polarization), спонтанная поляризация (spontaneous polarization), self potential log (an electrical log for indicating lithology)36) Глоссарий компании Сахалин Энерджи: seismic profile, standing pipe rack, каротаж собственного потенциала (spontaneous potential), потенциал самопроизвольной поляризации (Spontaneous Potential)37) Нефтегазовая техника самопроизвольная поляризация38) Образование: Schools Program, Skills Practice, Spell Points39) Инвестиции: stop payment40) Полимеры: series-parallel, single propellant, singlephase, sliced plate, smokeless propellant, soil pipe, solid propellant, solidifying point, spot plate, standard pitch, standard pressure, steam pressure, superior-processing41) Программирование: Single Precision, System Procedure42) Сахалин Р: Spontaneous Potential, spontaneous potential43) Сахалин А: set pressure44) Химическое оружие: secondary power45) Макаров: single-point, starting point46) Безопасность: Secure Proxy, Security Potential47) Расширение файла: Service Package, Stack Pointer, Summary Punch, Supervisory Printer, Service Pack (IBM), Compressed file archive (Splint)48) Автоматическое регулирование: set point, точка уставки ( регулятора) (точка цставки, настройки регулятора в контурах автоматического управления (регулирования))49) SAP.тех. хранимая процедура50) Нефть и газ: code of practice, self-potential curve, small power supply51) Электротехника: source point, spinning reserve52) Майкрософт: пакет обновления53) Общественная организация: Samaritan's Purse54) Должность: Senior Pastor, Street Photography, Superior Performance, Suppressive Person55) Чат: Shiny Pants, Social Points, Super Pretty56) Правительство: Sterling Park, Stevens Point57) НАСА: Sub Project58) Программное обеспечение: Service Pack, Smart Pointer -
20 Sp
1) Общая лексика: hum. сокр. Salvation Plan, specifications, поставщик услуг (бизнес, заключение договора), обслуживающая компания, обслуживающая организация2) Компьютерная техника: Single Processor, Stops Processing3) Медицина: sodium phosphate (фосфат натрия)4) Американизм: Semi Plenary, Special Publication5) Ботаника: Soil Properties6) Спорт: Sanity Points, Save Percentage, Short Program, Shoulder Pad, Single Play, Single Player, Spirit Points, Sports Plane, Sports Production, Starting Pitcher, Style Points, Subgame Perfect, Super Player7) Военный термин: Sabotage Pack, Security Pack, Security Policy, Shock Practice, Source Program, Special Proceeding, school of photography, seaplane, secret publication, security police, security policeman, security publication, self-propelled, sensor package, service pistol, service policeman, service publication, shipping port, shore party, sign post, signal post, signal processor, signal publication, single-purpose, smokeless powder, soft-point, spare part, spares planning, special performance, special planning, special program, special project, special projective, special propellants, special-purpose, specialist, splinter-protected, standard practice, standard procedure, standing procedure, start point, stragglers' post, strategic plan, strategic planning, strategic program, stretcher party, student pilot, submarine patrol, summary plotter, supply point, support publication, surveillance procedure, system parameter, systems planning8) Техника: Silk Purse, Silver Plated, Something Probably, Special Product, Square Pod, safety principles, sampling point, satellite processor, saturation paste, saturation percentage, security procedure, self-potential, separator, set point, short-period, shotpoint, signal projector, single pole, single-processor, solar panel, solidification point, space character, span value, stand pipe, star photometer, starting period, stellar photometry, superpressure, suppression pool, suspended particles9) Сельское хозяйство: superphosphate10) Шутливое выражение: Super Pud11) Химия: Solubility Product12) Математика: свойство вычитания (subtraction property), случайный процесс (stochastic process)13) Религия: Saint Peter, Supreme Power14) Железнодорожный термин: Union Pacific Railroad Company15) Юридический термин: State Police, Street Price16) Бухгалтерия: sales proceeds, selling price17) Автомобильный термин: запаска, запасное колесо, запчасть (spare part, обычно именно про колесо)18) Грубое выражение: Sex Partner, Shit Pot, Sneaky Peek, Stinky Poop, Stupid Parents, Stupid Party, Stupid Piece, Stupid Prat, Stupidly Priced, Sucky Piece19) Металлургия: straight polarity20) Телевидение: standart play21) Телекоммуникации: Signaling Point (ANSI)22) Сокращение: Civil aircraft marking (Poland), Satellite Photo, Shore Patrol (USA), Shore Patrol, Single-Phase, Smart Procurement (UK MoD), Socialist Party, Southern Pacific, Spain (NATO country code), Spotting round, Stabilised Platform, Star Patrol, Static Pressure, one-pole, sample part, seaplane port, shear plate, single-pole, spare, spare parts, species, specification, speed, splitting, stake and platform, standpipe, stop of payment, structured protection, supply, Short Play (VHS VCR), special (projectile)23) Университет: Satisfactory Progress, Student Program, Sure Pass24) Физиология: Sleep Paralysis, Spine, spinal25) Вычислительная техника: Signaling Point, Speculative Precomputation, Speech Processing, Structured Programming, System Product, semipermanent, shift pulse, sound parameters, square punch, параметры звука, Southern Pacific (Corporate name, Railroading), Service Provider (DMI), SPare (IMEI, GSM, Mobile-Systems), Simple visual Profile (MPEG), Service Pack (MS, Windows, NT), Service Processor (Power4, IBM, IC), Stack Pointer (register, CPU, Intel, Assembler)26) Нефть: (Vcl) clay content deduced from spontaneous potential (SP) log, bbl separator barrel, curve spontaneous polarization curve, reflected wave, self potential, set plug, shot point, shot points, slightly porous, spontaneous polarization, straddle packer, surface pressure, давление на устье скважины (surface pressure), естественный потенциал (self-potential), короткопериодный (short-period), место перфорирования, нормальное давление (safe pressure), пункт взрыва (shotpoint), сдвоенный пакер (straddle packer), точка взрыва (shot point), точка возбуждения (shot point), установка временной мостовой пробки (set plug), Spontaneous Potential Log27) Банковское дело: приостанавливать платёж (stop payment)28) Геофизика: ПВ, ПС, потенциал самопроизвольной поляризации29) Пищевая промышленность: Sugar Pie30) Силикатное производство: softening point, suspension preheater31) Воздухоплавание: Supervisory Package32) Фирменный знак: Simple Productions, Sprague33) СМИ: Special Presentation, Studio Package, Suggested Page34) Деловая лексика: Semidirect Product, Single Premium, Special Partner, Special Process, Starting Price35) Бурение: СП (spontaneous polarization), спонтанная поляризация (spontaneous polarization), self potential log (an electrical log for indicating lithology)36) Глоссарий компании Сахалин Энерджи: seismic profile, standing pipe rack, каротаж собственного потенциала (spontaneous potential), потенциал самопроизвольной поляризации (Spontaneous Potential)37) Нефтегазовая техника самопроизвольная поляризация38) Образование: Schools Program, Skills Practice, Spell Points39) Инвестиции: stop payment40) Полимеры: series-parallel, single propellant, singlephase, sliced plate, smokeless propellant, soil pipe, solid propellant, solidifying point, spot plate, standard pitch, standard pressure, steam pressure, superior-processing41) Программирование: Single Precision, System Procedure42) Сахалин Р: Spontaneous Potential, spontaneous potential43) Сахалин А: set pressure44) Химическое оружие: secondary power45) Макаров: single-point, starting point46) Безопасность: Secure Proxy, Security Potential47) Расширение файла: Service Package, Stack Pointer, Summary Punch, Supervisory Printer, Service Pack (IBM), Compressed file archive (Splint)48) Автоматическое регулирование: set point, точка уставки ( регулятора) (точка цставки, настройки регулятора в контурах автоматического управления (регулирования))49) SAP.тех. хранимая процедура50) Нефть и газ: code of practice, self-potential curve, small power supply51) Электротехника: source point, spinning reserve52) Майкрософт: пакет обновления53) Общественная организация: Samaritan's Purse54) Должность: Senior Pastor, Street Photography, Superior Performance, Suppressive Person55) Чат: Shiny Pants, Social Points, Super Pretty56) Правительство: Sterling Park, Stevens Point57) НАСА: Sub Project58) Программное обеспечение: Service Pack, Smart Pointer
Страницы
См. также в других словарях:
Systems engineering — is an interdisciplinary field of engineering that focuses on how complex engineering projects should be designed and managed. Issues such as logistics, the coordination of different teams, and automatic control of machinery become more difficult… … Wikipedia
Systems architect — In systems engineering, the systems architect is the high level designer of a system to be implemented.They establish the basic structure of the system, defining the core design features that are hard to change later. They provide the vision for… … Wikipedia
Systems theory — is an interdisciplinary field of science and the study of the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science. More specificially, it is a framework by which one can analyze and/or describe any group of objects that work in concert to… … Wikipedia
Principles of Intelligent Urbanism — (PIU) is a theory of urban planning composed of a set of ten axioms intended to guide the formulation of city plans and urban designs. They are intended to reconcile and integrate diverse urban planning and management concerns. These axioms… … Wikipedia
Systems science — is the interdisciplinary field of science, which studies the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science. It aims to develop interdisciplinary foundations, which are applicable in a variety of areas, such as engineering, biology,… … Wikipedia
Principles and Standards for School Mathematics — are guidelines produced by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) in 2000, setting forth recommendations for mathematics educators.[1] They form a national vision for preschool through twelfth grade mathematics education in the US … Wikipedia
Systems psychology — is a branch of applied psychology that studies human behaviour and experience in complex systems. It is inspired by systems theory and systems thinking, and based on the theoretical work of Roger Barker, Gregory Bateson, Humberto Maturana and… … Wikipedia
Systems of Survival — [cite book last=Jacobs first=Jane title=Systems of Survival publisher=Random House, Inc date=1992 id=ISBN 0 394 55079 X] is a 1992 book by Jane Jacobs describing two distinct ethical systems, or systems of survival as she calls them. She argues… … Wikipedia
Systems immunology — is a recent research field that, under the larger umbrella of systems biology, aims to study the immune system in the more integrated perspective on how entities and players participate at different system levels to the immune function.The immune … Wikipedia
Systems ecology — portal|Systems science|Complex adaptive system.jpgSystems ecology is an interdisciplinary field of ecology, taking a holistic approach to the study of ecological systems, especially ecosystems. Systems ecology can be seen as an application of… … Wikipedia
Principles of Organic Agriculture — The Principles of Organic Agriculture were established by the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) in September, 2005. They embody a global vision for organic farming. The Principles were approved by the General… … Wikipedia
